Tuesday, January 14, 2014

IBM Uses Big Data To Stop Hospital Infections


health care

IBM is using big data techniques in an analytics system designed to help prevent infections spreading within hospitals

On  by Darryl K. Taft, eWEEK USA 2013. 

IBM said it has teamed up with OhioHealth to tap big data to help prevent infections in US hospitals.
Big Blue announced it is part of a collaboration to aid in the prevention of infections using a first-of-a-kind network of wireless sensors and real-time big data analytics that measure hand-washing practices. OhioHealth will use the technology to provide hospital administrators with real-time data that can be used to reduce healthcare associated infections (HAIs) like methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Clostridium difficile, which affect 1 in every 20 patients in US healthcare facilities, the company said.

Pilot project

A pilot project in Columbus, Ohio, has achieved more than 90 percent compliance with hand-washing standards – a 20 percent jump over its previous practices and well above the 50 percent national compliance level, IBM said.
IBM logo © Tomasz Bidermann ShutterstiockUS health organisation the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that nearly 2 million US patients contract HAIs each year, and 90,000 die as a result. HAIs are also estimated to cost the US healthcare system $4.5 billion (£2.8bn) in related medical expenses every year. Hand hygiene is cited as the most effective way to prevent the spread of HAIs, and hospitals are aggressively working to elevate hand washing compliance to 100 percent.
The solution developed by IBM Research and OhioHealth combines two technologies to measure and analyse hand hygiene. First are the hand-washing sensors developed by IBM Research. These Low-power Mote Technologies (LMT) with built-in RFID capabilities measure and control physical systems, such as hand-washing stations. The LMT sensors are located at hand-washing stations in patient rooms and hallways, and are connected through a wireless mesh network. They capture time-stamped information on use of each hand washing station. They also detect when hospital staff enter or exist patient rooms and, thanks to their RFID technology, they are able to identify healthcare workers.
For data analytics, IBM crated Measurement and Managements Technologies (MMT) to collect, manage and process real-time data. The hand-washing data is streamed via cloud technology to the MMT where it is analysed and stored to be used for on-demand reports, presentations and compliance studies. The analytics use the raw data streamed by the motes to determine whether or not hand washing events took place. The on-demand data can be used to estimate compliance levels, trends and correlations for different departments, shifts and job roles.

New insights

The IBM technology installed at one of OhioHealth’s Columbus hospitals provides the hospital staff with new information and observations that were not available before. Analysing hand-washing data gives stakeholders insights into the compliance levels of different departments, shifts, job roles, as well as variations based on other social behavioural factors. The real-time information is used to alert hospital personnel when proper hygiene habits are not being followed so that corrective action can be taken to reduce germ exposure to patients.
“OhioHealth is always looking for smarter ways to protect the health of our patients,” said Michael Krouse, senior vice president and CIO of OhioHealth, in a statement. “Superbugs like MRSA can live for hours on surfaces, and we want to do everything we can to protect our patients from these kinds of serious infections. Working with IBM, we will gain additional insights that will help us consistently achieve total compliance with hand-washing standards and fight back against these bugs.”
“Hospitals everywhere are grappling with ways to prevent infections, and we believe OhioHealth’s forward-thinking approach will raise the bar for the entire industry,” said Dr. Sergio Bermudez, an IBM research scientist, in a statement. “Innovative organisations like OhioHealth are leveraging the power of technology to provide smarter care for their patients to improve quality while reducing cost.”
The joint effort of OhioHealth, IBM Research and IBM Global Business Services represents a milestone in how healthcare facilities can more efficiently track their progress in hand hygiene promotion, plan for improvements and set new goals, IBM said.


Justice Dept. says Health Management Associates ex-CEO aided 'scheme'

Former Health Management Associates CEO Gary Newsome has emerged as a defendant in a broad whistle-blower investigation alleging the Naples-based hospital system engaged in kickbacks to boost patient admissions, regardless of medical necessity.
In a news release Monday, the Department of Justice alleges Newsome directed corporate officers to exert “significant pressure” on emergency physicians and hospital administrators.
“The Department of Justice is committed to ensuring that health care providers who attempt to misuse federal health care programs for their own profit are held accountable,” said Stuart F. Delery, assistant attorney general for the Justice Department’s civil division, in a statement. “Schemes such as this one can contribute significantly to the rising cost of delivering health care and create needless patient risk.”
Newsome stepped down from his post in July to serve as as president of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints’ Uruguay-Montevideo Mission in South America.
HMA did not immediately respond to the government’s Monday afternoon announcement.
The company operates 71 hospitals in 15 states, including Lehigh Regional Medical Center, two Physicians Regional Medical Center hospitals in Naples and two health centers in Charlotte County.
The Justice Department has joined eight related lawsuits in recent months. It also accuses HMA of inflating billing claims to Medicare and Medicaid and paying other physician groups for referrals.
The Florida case accused the company of providing up to $800,000 worth of office space, equipment and other payments to Primary Care Associates of North Port in exchange for patient referrals to its hospitals. According to the suit, Primary Care Associates referrals accounted for one-third of revenues for both HMA hospitals in Charlotte County between 2004 and mid-2007, or more than $48 million.
HMA shareholders last week overwhelmingly voted to approve a $7.6 billion deal that would turn the company over to Tennessee-based Community Health Systems.

Welcome to Zappos-Style Health Innovation


1/14/14
But there’s another unusual aspect to this clinic. Many of the patients will be paying for care out of their own pockets, thereby sidestepping the administrative overhead and pressures caused by health insurance.Zappos CEO Tony Hsieh’s effort to revitalize downtown Las Vegas includes last month’s launch of a new clinic, run by Iora Health and spearheaded by physician Zubin Damania. Stanford-trained, Damania also happens to rap by the name of ZDoggMD. So it’s no wonder the project has drawn attention.
A growing number of primary care doctors see this not only as a respite from their increasingly demoralizing work circumstances, but as a chance to do what they dreamed of in medical school. Research has long shown that good primary care is the cornerstone of a cost-effective healthcare system. In this type of setting, they can do more to help their patients—and without working to exhaustion or running up huge costs.
The patients pay for their care out of their own pockets with a modest ($60-80) monthly subscription fee. Annualized, that’s actually lower than many of today’s health plan deductibles. The doctors spend as much time with the patients as needed. They are even accessible 24/7 by phone and e-mail. In addition, each patient gets a personal health coach to help them improve their health. A coach may help diabetics learn to shop for food or help people with respiratory problems learn to allergy-proof their home.
Getting rid of insurance overhead alone cuts costs by as much as 40 percent. Letting the doctors take their time and concentrate on treatment and diagnosis also saves big money in the long run. Iora practices, and others like them, have reported savings in the 20 to 30 percent range so far.
One reason for that: The more time that primary care doctors spend with their patients, the fewer referrals to costly specialists they make, and fewer tests and procedures they need to order. Over the last ten years, the rate of referrals has skyrocketed as primary care doctors have been squeezed to do more in less time. In the 10-to-15-minute window insurance reimburses for, there is often little time to do more than type in a referral.
These newer types of clinics are a growing phenomenon in U.S. healthcare. They are referred to as concierge or direct primary care. The concierge practices are usually high-priced, cater to wealthy patients, and provide extra frills. But price-friendly, subscription-based primary care is now catching on. The number of such offices is growing at a rate of 25 percent per year, according to the American Academy of Private Physicians.
Some big-name investors seem to agree there’s promise in this approach. Hsieh recently invested in our company, Iora Health. Amazon’s Jeff Bezos was an early investor in one of our competitors, Qliance, as were Michael Dell and Drew Carey. We and others have attracted a growing number of venture capital investments as well.
Direct primary care is not just for the rich or middle class. In New York, we are partnering with Grameen PrimaCare to provide health care for members of Grameen America, a microfinance organization founded by Nobel Peace Laureate Muhammad Yunus. Together, we are building a clinic to open in mid-2014 that can meet the needs of even the poorest of New York’s working poor.
What’s driving this trend? Recent reports about insurance rate shock and big out-of-pocket expenses remind us that simply giving people access to health insurance doesn’t make them healthier. If they can’t afford the premiums or deductibles, they won’t get care. Company CEOs are particularly familiar with this problem. They want their employees to be healthy without breaking the bank. In a recent Gallup survey, 30 percent of adults reported skipping needed care because of costs.
Imagine spending as long as you need talking to your doctor about your health. What if your mother’s doctor called the hospital before she was admitted, stayed in close communication with them during her stay, and then saw her the day she was released to review her medications and treatment plan?
A provision in Obamacare even allows insurance companies to offer very low cost policies (wrap arounds) that complement this new enhanced primary care service. These policies only cover the type of specialized care you can’t get in your family doctor’s office as well as tests, hospital care, and medications, making them especially affordable. Will insurance companies see an advantage to offering such plans? Uptake nationally so far has been slow, but we are working with the Nevada Health Co-Op to offer just such a plan for the Las Vegas practice.
The self-pay primary care movement is currently small; only about half a million patients use such a practice today. But the patients who do use it report tremendous satisfaction. Direct primary care could be a big boon for middle-class patients caught between rising costs and shrinking paychecks.
For the working poor, however, such a model could be lifesaving. That’s why we plan eventually to build such clinics throughout the world. Imagine the U.S. exporting affordable care delivery to the rest of the globe? That would certainly get people’s attention.


Rushika Fernandopulle is a primary care physician, former director of the Harvard Interfaculty Program for Health Systems Improvement, and the co-founder and CEO of Iora Health. Follow @rushika1

Monday, January 13, 2014

HCPCS G8553 that was used for eRx claims is no longer valid for the dates of services from Jan 1, 2014

Electronic Prescribing (eRx) Incentive Program:
2014 eRx Payment Adjustment Informal Review Made Simple

HCPCS G8553 that was used for eRx claims is no longer valid for the dates of services from Jan 1, 2014

G8553 that was used for eRx claims is no longer valid for claims billed dates of service 01/01/2014 and after.
Individual eligible professionals and group practices participating in the eRx Group Practice Reporting Option (GPRO) who are not successful electronic prescribers will be subject to a 2.0% payment adjustment on their Medicare Part B services provided January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014.
To avoid the 2014 eRx payment adjustment, individual eligible professionals would have had to have been a successful electronic prescriber in 2012 and reported the G8553 code via claims for at least 10 billable Medicare Part B PFS services provided January 1, 2013 through June 30, 2013.

The following is from the CMS website:


Background
The Electronic (eRx) Prescribing Incentive Program is a voluntary reporting program that provides
an incentive payment to identified individual eligible professionals, or CMS-selected group
practices participating in the eRx group practice reporting option (GPRO), who satisfactorily
report data on the eRx Incentive Program measure for covered PFS services furnished to Medicare
Part B FFS beneficiaries.

Eligible professionals or eRx GPROs who do not successfully report the required number of eRx
events may be subject to a payment adjustment. For complete information see the Centers for

Purpose
This Fact Sheet provides step-by-step guidance for those eligible professionals and eRx GPROs
receiving the 2014 eRx payment adjustment who wish to request an informal review of the 2014 eRx
payment adjustment determination. This document does not provide guidance for other Medicare or
Medicaid incentive programs, such as the Maintenance of Certification Program or the Electronic
Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program.

Informal Review – Quick Facts
•    Eligible professionals or eRx GPROs can request a review of their 2014 eRx payment adjustment
determination during the informal review period, November 1, 2013 through February 28, 2014.
•    The informal review will be for all reporting transmission methods, including:
o Claims
o Qualified registry
o Qualified EHR
•  CMS will utilize information in the Provider Enrollment Chain Ownership System (PECOS) for
informal review processes. Be sure organization and provider information is accurate in PECOS.

How to Request an Informal Review of the 2014 eRx Payment Adjustment

Use the following steps to request an informal review of the 2014 eRx payment adjustment:

STEP 1: Individual eligible professionals or designated support staff will need to email a request
with the following information:
•     Organization’s legal business name as enrolled in PECOS

  • Individual Rendering National Provider Identifier (NPI) (must be a 10-digit number, do not send a Group NPI) 

•     Eligible professional’s name as enrolled in PECOS
•     Eligible professional’s complete mailing address
•     Eligible professional’s phone number and extension if applicable
•     Eligible professional’s email address
•    The requestor relationship to the eligible professional (i.e., self, support staff, vendor)
•    Provide justification as to why the eligible professional(s) believes his/her 2014 eRx payment adjustment determination should be reviewed

The eRx GPRO contact person will need to email a request with the following information:

•     Organization’s legal business name as enrolled in PECOS
•     Organization’s complete mailing address
•     Contact person’s phone number and extension if applicable
•     Contact person’s email address
•     Provide justification as to why the group believes their 2014 eRx payment adjustment
determination should be reviewed

Note: To avoid security violations, do not include the full TIN in the email request to CMS.

STEP 2: To submit an eRx Informal review request, email CMS at
eRxInformalReview@cms.hhs.gov. Do not include the full TIN in the email request.


STEP 3: The above information must be emailed with the request to CMS. CMS must receive the
informal review request during the informal review period, November 1, 2013
through February 28, 2014.


Informal Review Decision
Eligible professionals or support staff who submit valid requests for an informal review will be
notified via email of the decision by CMS within 90 days of the submission of the original request
for an informal review. Please note that the informal review decision will be final, and there will
be no further review or appeal.

Additional Information
http://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/ERxIncentive/index.html?redirect=/ERXincentive/


ER study only half the story

The findings of a major study published this month cast doubt on the Obama administration's claim that emergency room use would decline, and costs would drop, as previously uninsured people obtained health insurance.
Opponents of health care reform saw the study on Oregon's expansion of Medicaid, published in Science magazine, as proof that the goals of the Affordable Care Act could not be achieved.
But reports of the study failed to note that the research covered the first year of Oregon's Medicaid expansion, in 2008 - before Obamacare was even proposed. They failed to point out that in the five years since, Oregon has significantly changed the way it delivers health care to Medicaid patients. As it has moved primary care outside the emergency department, diverting patients to less costly settings if they didn't need emergency care, Oregon has seen patient behavior change.
In the past two years, ER visits by Medicaid patients have dropped by 9 percent, and emergency department spending has decreased by 18 percent. Hospital admissions for congestive heart failure dropped by 29 percent, "chronic obstructive pulmonary disease by 28 percent and adult asthma by 14 percent," the Portland Business Journal reported in November.
Oregon, which has 600,000 people on Medicaid, has as many as 130,000 new patients entering its system through the Affordable Care Act's Medicaid expansion this month. State officials are confident the new system will continue to reduce ER visits and allow the coordinated care organizations to stay within their budgets.
That's welcome news for other states expanding Medicaid to reach more of the poor and uninsured, as directed by the 2010 law.
The law, designed to provide health insurance to every American and lower spiralling medical costs, has been beset by myriad problems and has far fewer people signed up than promised. President Barack Obama delayed implementation of parts of the law, leaving only a shell of a health insurance delivery program in place this month.
But the states in the forefront of revamping health care to manage diseases and prevent problems are making strides.
Sadly, Virginia remains on the sidelines, having eschewed the federal money to expand Medicaid to cover another 400,000 Virginians.
The money the commonwealth's hospitals used to receive as reimbursement for ER visits by the uninsured will go to places like Oregon, where health experts are reducing health care spending even as they provide immunizations, prenatal care and physicals to more residents.


Medicare Program; Contract Year 2015 Policy and Technical Changes to the Medicare Advantage and the Medicare Prescription Drug Benefit Programs

This rule would set forth programmatic and operational changes to the Medicare Advantage (MA) and prescription drug benefit programs for contract year 2015.

Medicare Program; Contract Year 2015 
Policy and Technical Changes to the 
Medicare Advantage and the Medicare 
Prescription Drug Benefit Programs 

AGENCY: Centers for Medicare & 
Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS. 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: The proposed rule would 
revise the Medicare Advantage (MA) 
program (Part C) regulations and 
prescription drug benefit program (Part 
D) regulations to implement statutory 
requirements; strengthen beneficiary 
protections; exclude plans that perform 
poorly; improve program efficiencies; 
and clarify program requirements. The 
proposed rule also includes several 
provisions designed to improve 
payment accuracy. 

DATES: To be assured consideration, 
comments must be received at one of 
the addresses provided below, no later 

than 5 p.m. on March 7, 2014.

Read more: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2014-01-10/pdf/2013-31497.pdf


Thursday, January 9, 2014

Dr. D. and Natalie need your HELP to Eliminate ERRORS in Risk Adjustment!

Engage, Capture, and Innovate at the Point of Care...

What if this "perfect storm" closing in on healthcare is really the "perfect opportunity"?

Can we change behavior at the Point of Care through On-Demand Learning?





Help Dr. D and Natalie eliminate errors in Medicare Risk Adjustment. By correctly answering the questions, you can help their clinic improve the entire experience of care for their patients! Click on Natalie, to the left to get started!




Practice your ICD-10 Skills too!

Dr. D and Natalie need your help with Mr. DeNile. He's Dr. D's banker, and WE NEED YOUR RIGHT answers to keep Mr. DeNile from taking US to the Bank!
Click the logo below to play!

Register TODAY for  these E-Learning Programs - Registration is completely FREE!

What are you waiting for?

Sunday, January 5, 2014

How Much Do You Know About the CMS-HCC Model for 2014?

Are you prepared for Medicare Risk Adjustment in 2014?


If so, 

Test your skills at the MRA SPEEDWAY

This race covers Medicare Risk Adjustment and the 2014 CMS-HCC Model 79!

Sit back, buckle up and click the "Launch Course" button to begin!

Launch button

Friday, January 3, 2014

JOIN Dr. D and Natalie and for FOR FREE ICD-10 Training TODAY



OCTOBER 1, 2014 IS FAST APPROACHING!

WILL YOUR PRACTICE BE READY?

JOIN Dr. D. and Natalie as they explore ICD-10 Training. 

Learn the basic principles and general guidelines of ICD-10    

Launch button


Explore Chapters 1 -3   

Launch button


Or Join Dr. D and Natalie for a SECRET MISSION in Chapters 4 - 6  


Launch button


After all of that, if your still up for a challenge, Dr. D and Natalie need your help with Mr. DeNile. He's Dr. D's banker, and WE NEED YOUR RIGHT answers to keep Mr. DeNile from taking US to the Bank!

Click the Orange Button to
Launch button



What if this "perfect storm" is just a "perfect opportunity" to Improve?

Join Dr. D. and Natalie in their online learning community today. 
It's completely free, so what are you waiting for?



Monday, December 30, 2013

Howell clinic rolls out new model for primary care

BlueSky Health has plan for $30 a month

“If someone has a sore throat, they can take a picture of their sore throat, send us a text, and we can
potentially treat it just that way,” Valenti said. “But if they do need to come in and see us, we can generally
see them same day or next day.”

While BlueSky Direct currently is being sold to and used by individuals, Valenti said the goal is to
collaborate with employers, unions, municipalities and insurers — and save everyone money in the long
run.

Preventive care and disease management, he said, are key components to a quality primary care product.
“When you buy coffee, you want it to be hot and you want it to taste good. We’re saying to any employer
or individual or any payer to hold us to two criteria: Have we kept you out of the emergency room, and
have we kept you out of the hospital? If we’ve done those two things, then we’ve done our job,” Valenti
said.

BlueSky Health opened its Howell clinic in April 2012. It’s other clinic in Houghton was founded in 2006 by
Dr. Jeff Huotari, the company’s CEO.

The Howell clinic is the launch pad for its direct primary care model, which Valenti said isn’t being
provided anywhere else in Michigan on a grand scale.

“It makes a lot of sense to us; it’s just a matter of getting the word out,” Valenti said.
To enroll in BlueSky Direct, patients pay a six-month minimum upfront but can cancel at any time after
that.

For more information about BlueSky Direct, call 517-545-2400 or 888-288-0201,
or go to http://www.blueskyhealth.org/ bluesky-direct.

http://www.livingstondaily.com/article/20131229/NEWS01/312290012/Howell-clinic-rolls-out-new-model-primary-care


Premier Medical Associates refocuses on a more hands-on, comprehensive approach

For decades, the sore throat -- pharyngitis, in clinical terms -- has been the bread and butter of family practice, a symptom of acute bronchitis, strep throat and any number of winter ailments. So when the number-crunchers at Premier Medical Associates noticed that sore-throat visits had dropped by two-thirds over a one-year period, they knew it was more than an aberration.
"This isn't where our practice is going to be, going forward," said Frank Colangelo, an internist who heads the quality control team at Premier, the biggest multispecialty medical practice in Pittsburgh's eastern suburbs, now fully owned by Highmark.
That was in 2008, just as the recession was taking hold and not long after fast-growing urgent care chain MedExpress put its stakes down in Pittsburgh. Office visits at Premier were down by 1,000, out of 80,000 total, mirroring the trend across the country. Patients were either postponing care altogether because of the recession, or taking their sore-throat business toward urgent clinics, which continue to siphon away more of the "acute" illness cases.
Even after the recession ended, Premier realized many of those patients wouldn't be coming back, said CEO Mark DeRubeis. The options were stark -- be content with a fading business model or remake the business model altogether.
Which is how Premier came to be one of the region's most influential evangelists for the "patient-centered medical home" model of care -- an industry buzz-term meant to convey a more hands-on, comprehensive approach that uses doctors, nurses and other professionals to track chronic issues and coordinate the health of a patient population.
In other words, more about the health of the patient and less about the health of the practice.
"It sounds so intuitive, people would assume, 'Gee, isn't that what I'm getting now?' " Mr. DeRubeis said. "Unfortunately, the answer is no."
Medicine -- not just primary care -- has been long wed to the acute-care model, largely because patients tend to seek care when they get sick. "You wake up. You don't feel well. You call the doctor ... and then pretty much you go away until you decide you don't feel good again," Mr. DeRubeis said.
The patient-centered medical home seeks to move care toward a more preventive model and, when prevention doesn't work, a more active management of chronic issues such as diabetes and pulmonary disease. That management manifests itself in a variety of ways: follow-up phone calls post-hospitalization, rigorous prescription reconciliation, regular benchmarking of patient vitals (such as blood pressure) and, most importantly, hiring more staff.
All of that case management requires more manpower -- more physicians, as well as more nurse practitioners and physician assistants. And Premier soon figured out, "We really don't have enough capacity to manage all the chronic care that we know we need to provide," Mr. DeRubeis said.
Fewer visits, more capacity
So it started hiring. Premier now has more than 80 medical doctors and doctors of osteopathy, and about 100 providers in total. That's up from the 65 providers on staff just two years ago. It also keeps a staff of 18 "hospitalists," who are meant to keep tabs on Premier patients when they end up at Forbes Hospital in Monroeville.
Having sets of eyes and ears in the hospital allows the practice to better coordinate the patient's care, and also frees up the rest of the primary care physicians to focus on their jobs.
The care "is handled better that way," said James Costlow, internist at Premier. "A primary care doctor can't be in two places at one time. ... People in the hospital need 24-hour care. And if I'm seeing my usual daily chronic-disease and acute-cares in the office, I'm not over at the hospital."
With a split staff, hospitalists can give their full attention to inpatient cases, and office physicians can see their full complement of 24 patients a day, every 20 minutes, without being interrupted with trips to the hospital.
At first, Dr. Costlow said, "Our fears were that it would [create] fragmented care."
But that fear proved unfounded, partly because of another game-changer -- electronic medical records. Premier installed its Allscripts electronic health records system two years ago, and now physicians can more easily track and exchange patient records between specialists and between sites.
Forbes hospitalists have access to the registry, too.
The orthopedic specialist can now instantly see what tests the internist has ordered; the hospitalists and even triage nurses in the Forbes emergency room can open up the patient's records to see what drugs have been prescribed recently.
"It's always helpful if somebody can see the whole patient chart," said Joanne Wall, Premier's chief operating officer. Across the country, she said, a significant percentage of hospital readmissions are due to adverse drug events, such as overdoses.
Even among patients who aren't readmitted to hospitals, their discharge papers often omit important prescription information or contain other medication discrepancies.
"It's imperative that med reconciliation is done at every point of transition of care," Ms. Wall said. Before the electronic records system was installed, there was a "dependency on the patient [to] provide all this information about their medications. That's not working."
The electronic records help, but Premier's "care coordinators" play a key role, too, following up with a patient post-discharge to make sure that they understand the doctor's order; that they know what medications they are taking and have filled their prescriptions; that they are able to care for themselves; and so on. Those coordinators usually reach out to a patient by phone within a day of discharge.
"The primary care doc needs to do this. We need to be responsible for all of the care that the patient gets, whether it's in Premier, or externally," Ms. Wall said. That's at the root of the patient-centered medical home concept.
Premier's shift from an acute-care model to a patient-centered one was cemented in 2011, when the practice received a call from Highmark Inc., asking if it wanted to participate in the health insurer's new medical home pilot. UPMC Health Plan also invited Premier to do the same.
Premier (then the largest independent medical practice in the region, though it has since sold a controlling stake to Highmark) would be asked to meet quality care benchmarks and track outcomes. Payments would be tied to the quality of that care, rather than the quantity.
"If you are successful, the rewards come down the road," Mr. DeRubeis said.
Competing with the big boys
The rewards did not come as initially envisioned. The following year, in summer 2012, Highmark abandoned the pilot. "They determined that their ability to socialize [the pilot was limited] across the broad network," Mr. DeRubeis said, because most independent practices don't have the infrastructure in place to make such sweeping operational changes.
Nor do most independent practices have a base of 100,000 patients -- including 45,000 adult primary care lives and 15,000 pediatric patients -- that can be mined for broad, meaningful health data, as Premier does.
So if Premier were to continue with this new model, it would be doing so more or less self-sufficiently.
"We decided to keep on," Mr. DeRubeis said. "It was expensive, it required a tremendous commitment of time, energy and resources," spent on new software and hardware, as well as the hiring of eight new nurses to work as care coordinators.
But "the most important tool in the box [is] the culture," he said. If the physicians and care professionals weren't on board with the makeover, it could not have taken root.
The culture was there, and the financial and clinical results have been satisfying: 73 percent of patients aged 50 to 75 have had colon screenings -- a year ago, the number was below 60 percent (the goal is an 80 percent screening rate).
About 65 percent of Premier patients with diagnosed hypertension have their blood pressure under control (the national rate is 53 percent).
And a recent population survey showed that Premier had lower-than-anticipated rates of depression among patients with poorly controlled chronic diseases, a finding that was surprising because it was expected one condition reinforced the other.
Those clinical results, the physicians said, outpace most other practices in the region, a claim underscored by Premier's head-of-the-class score in Highmark's "Quality Blue" program, which gives bonuses to practices and hospitals that meet certain cost and quality benchmarks. Only a few dozen practices achieved Highmark's highest-quality scores.
"It's hard to do this," Dr. Costlow said. "And I find it hard to believe there's only [a few dozen] good groups out there. Being a good physician or a good group doesn't [always] translate into delivering quality or, more importantly, delivering value."
Which is why it could take decades to fully move to a system that pays doctors and hospitals for quality, performance and cost-effectiveness. At Premier, the per-patient cost of care is 7 percent below the rest of the market, according to Highmark's own payment data.
"That's our competitive advantage -- higher quality care at a lower cost," Mr. DeRubeis. "That's where the market is going."
It's not going fast enough, though. Premier figured that by the time patients and insurers realized the practice's value proposition, it might have lost too much market share to urgent care clinics and hospital-owned practices. That's one reason it agreed to sell the practice to Highmark two years ago.
"Eventually, you cannot compete with the big boys," Mr. DeRubeis said. "You're going to need access to capital, and you're gonna need resources" to make wholesale changes in workflow, technical infrastructure and, ultimately, clinical care.
"What better pairing than an organization whose competitive advantage is to provide more value, pairing up with the organization that benefits from that value?"

http://www.post-gazette.com/business/2013/12/29/Patients-not-the-practice/stories/201312290106

Sunday, December 29, 2013

FREE ICD-10 TRAINING FOR YOUR ENTIRE OFFICE


FREE ICD-10 TRAINING FOR YOUR ENTIRE OFFICE!

CLICK THE ORANGE BUTTON BELOW

TO START LESSON 1: BASIC PRINCIPLES


Launch button


Contact: www.ermconsultinginc.com for more information

Wednesday, December 18, 2013

10 Compliance Issues for Physicians, Health Systems and Providers in 2014


Meaningful Use Audits: Physicians, hospitals, and others that have received incentive payments to integrate electronic medical records into their practices will likely be subject to an audit from either Medicare or Medicaid to assess whether the providers have actually made meaningful use of these funds and systems. Auditors are likely to demand evidence of meaningful use of incentive monies and repayment when providers cannot back up the attestations made for Stage 1 compliance.  Providers should be on the lookout for audit request letters sent via email by the contracted auditor.  Make sure that whoever has the email address registered with CMS checks for an audit letter.  In addition, providers should make sure that all meaningful use attestations are backed up and documentation is maintained for the six years that CMS requires. Some of the required evidence includes EHR vendor agreements, attestation reports on clinical quality measures, statements from EHR vendors, information used to generate numerator and denominator values for reporting, et cetera. If an audit letter is received, contact should be made immediately.   Providers need to pay attention to these responses; a failure to respond adequately could result in more than just a request for repayment.
Assuring and Measuring Compliance with HIPAA and HITECH: Increased audit and enforcement activities related to HIPAA and HITECH are coming and providers should ensure that they have implemented required changes such as identifying business associates and executing compliant business associate agreements as well as implementing security standards and testing for patient information and reporting breaches.   Also, expect increased enforcement activities from Kentucky’s Attorney General as HITECH granted enforcement authority to the Attorney General along with the opportunity to seek damages.
Stark Law Application to Medicaid Claims: While the Stark Law on its face applies only to Medicare, recent court decisions have found that a Medicaid claim filed in violation of the Stark Law also constituted a false claim.  Courts have now found False Claims Act liability for Medicaid claims filed in violation of the Stark Law.  Historically, the federal government had focused enforcement efforts on Medicare claims.    Carving out Medicaid referrals and claims in health care transactions is no longer prudent. All contracts and transactions should be reviewed for compliance with the Stark Law even if the contract only applies to services for private pay or Medicaid patients.
Medicaid Integrity Contractor Audits:  As the Medicaid review auditors are finalizing their review of the big data to identify providers who fall outside billing standards, these reports are being released to Medicaid for provider audits and collection of overpayments.  Challenging overpayments must be made through Kentucky’s Medicaid appeal process, which establishes important deadlines for requesting a dispute resolution meeting when an overpayment is identified.  If a DRM is not requested, then repayment is due in 30 days.  Providers should pay close attention to these deadlines and exercise their ability to challenge overpayments.
Measuring Quality:  As CMS’ Physician Compare website joins the nursing facility and hospital compare websites, physicians must be ever mindful that quality scores will ultimately impact reimbursement for all payors, not just Medicare and its incentive payments. Physician groups as well as all providers should carefully develop their quality measures. As ACOs, hospital systems and payors develop their own quality measures, individual physicians must be aware of those measures and how they affect them.  Participation in networks, ACOs, and even Medicaid may become tied to performance.  All physicians, even those who are employed by health systems, should be careful in their contracting and knowledgeable about their individual quality and performance.
Medical Staff Membership and Credentialing:  Changes in Joint Commission for Accreditation of Health Care Organization’s requirements for medical staff credentialing have made evaluation of a physician’s quality of care an element of the credentialing and recredentialing process.  How this evaluation takes place and the factors that are considered are left to the medical staff, which, in reality, usually means administration.  The information about this evaluation becomes a permanent part of a physician’s records.  Every physician should be aware of this, find out about evaluation results, and challenge them if necessary. A challenge does not mean that a physician impairs his/her privileges, but rather seeks to maintain an accurate credentialing file.
Retention of Overpayments:  Retention of a Medicare or Medicaid overpayment can create false claims liability and treble damages recovery when the overpayment is not returned within 60 days.  The ACA created the duty to report and return known overpayments.  While the law sounds simple, its application is anything but simple and creates a host of issues for providers including determining when an overpayment is known to the provider.  For example, is the billing clerk’s knowledge imputed to the physician owner of the practice?  Also, when reporting an overpayment, does a provider have a duty to look back to see if there are other overpayments?
Expansion of Medicaid Beneficiaries: With Kentucky’s successful rollout of its Health Insurance Exchange and the possibility of 308,389[i] new Medicaid   beneficiaries, what is the health care provider’s duty to take on more Medicaid patients?  Should a provider establish express limits on the number of Medicaid patients that a practice will accept as patients? Does this create liability under provider agreements with Medicaid Managed Care payors?  These issues will become even more important as the number of beneficiaries increases.
Prescribing Controlled Substances in Kentucky:  The war on prescription drug abuse has taken a terrible toll on physicians as House Bill 1 and the implementing regulations issued by the Kentucky Board of Medical Licensure have forever changed how and when a physician may prescribe controlled substances.  While the regulations have been slightly tweaked, physicians must take extraordinary efforts to build the procedures and processes required for prescribing into their day- to- day practice.  Physicians should be aware that the Drug Control Branch of Kentucky’s OIG routinely reviews KASPER data and reports the highest prescribers of controlled substances to the KBML for investigation.  Physician responses to these investigations must be careful and complete with the understanding that there is little recourse if a violation is found.
Getting Paid:  All providers must take active steps to assure that they are paid, which includes keeping abreast of a myriad of payment issues and policies.  A provider’s staff must be diligent in following up with insurance companies, Medicaid, and Medicare to seek payment.  The squeaky wheel gets oiled first.  Providers also need to be aware that preventive benefits such as cholesterol screenings and vaccinations are now free of charge through all Marketplace plans and many other insurance plans, including Medicare, Medicaid, and private insurance plans.  Providers should be prepared that they will no longer be able to collect a copay from any member of these plans, regardless of whether that member has met his or her deductible.  A list of preventive benefits covered by most plans under the ACA can be found at https://www.healthcare.gov/what-are-my-preventive-care-benefits/.  Providers, particularly physicians, should pay attention to proposed federal legislation that will finally repeal the sustainable growth rate and replace it with a methodology that ties payments to quality and efficiency, incorporates alternative payment models and improves the fee for service system by including value-based performance measures. This bill has the support of both Senate and House committees.  We will see…….

Concierge medicine on the rise in San Diego


Paying extra for better access to a doctor, often called concierge medicine, is growing in San Diego County.
Experts say the reasons range from a long-standing dissatisfaction with traditional managed care to more immediate worries about a possible doctor shortage driven by federal health reform.
While local specialists have mixed opinions on what is driving the growth, many said they believe the practice of charging a yearly membership fee in exchange for direct access to primary care doctors is on the rise.
An online directory maintained by the American Academy of Private Physicians, which listed 17 concierge specialists in 2011, today lists more than 60.
Tom Blue, chief strategy officer for the academy, said the directory can give only an approximate number for concierge doctors in a given community because none are compelled to be listed. Still, he said, concierge medicine is becoming more popular.
“We estimate that we’re seeing a 25 percent per year growth rate nationwide and, in terms of the concentration of private physicians around the country, it appears that California is the leading state,” Blue said.
Growth has come not just from single physicians deciding to change the way they practice. Major players like UC San Diego Health System and Scripps Health are also big players in the local market.
Concierge medicine is, at its most basic, a return to the age when doctors made house calls and were paid directly by the patients they treated.
These days, with instant communications and health insurance companies in the mix, things are more complicated. But the main point is the same: Families pay a subscription fee, ranging from hundreds to thousands of dollars per year, for more direct access to their doctors.
The rise of the concierge doctor at first came as a reaction to the heavily scheduled nature of modern medicine, where doctors working in large groups must see dozens of patients per day and seldom have much more than a few minutes to spend getting to know, or listen to, those they treat.
Concierge doctors are responsible for fewer patients and make up the difference by charging their fee. With most doctors, this fee gives patients much longer appointment times and direct access via cellphone, email or both. While the doctor’s attention is covered by the yearly fee, additional services like blood tests or visits to specialists are still the patient’s responsibility. Most still have health insurance, and concierge doctors have various ways of helping make sure that carriers are billed.
Pam Brar, a solo internal medicine doctor with a concierge practice on the Scripps Memorial La Jolla campus, said time and attention were the main reasons cited by patients when she first started in 2004.
But lately, she said, many of her new patients are citing the Affordable Care Act, often called Obamacare, as a reason they want to sign up. Many, she said, fear clogged waiting rooms and months waiting for an appointment when thousands of newly insured residents arrive after the first of the year.
“I would say almost all of the people I have spoken to recently, that was a concern they had,” Brar said.
Blue, the academy representative, said the trend is national.
“People have a sense that, particularly in primary care, there just aren’t enough doctors to go around. Most people are pretty concerned with solidifying their primary care relationship,” he said.
Brar said her practice has 185 patients today and is growing. She charges $2,500 per patient per year and plans to increase that to about $3,300 after leaving the Scripps La Jolla campus and moving into downtown La Jolla.
Dr. Marty Schulman, a concierge doctor in Encinitas, said he charges $800 per patient per year, and $500 for each additional family member. Unlike Brar, Schulman said he has not experienced as much Obamacare concern. Rather, he said, most people are still more motivated by the time-constrained nature of the traditional health system.
Still, he said he is not discounting the possibility that Obamacare will start his phone ringing in the new year.
While multiple studies have confirmed that there is a doctor shortage in the United States, that does not appear to be the case in primary care in San Diego County.
A list provided in July by the state medical board lists 4,097 doctors in the county in the specialties of family medicine, internal medicine and pediatrics, the three specialties generally considered primary care.
That’s far more than the 1,547 that would need to be available, according the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, which recommends 1 primary care doctor per 2,000 residents.
But health reform, which requires most Americans to buy health insurance in 2014 or pay a penalty if they are not already covered by company policies or a government program like Medicare, will bring thousands more insured people into the market soon.
Covered California, the state’s health insurance exchange, estimated in June that 193,000 San Diego County residents will qualify to buy policies. And that number does not include thousands of additional local residents who will newly qualify for insurance under Medicare.
No one knows for sure how the local network of providers will absorb the crush of newly insured. While large networks like Scripps Health, Sharp HealthCare, Kaiser Permanente and UC San Diego Health System have all said recently that they are confident their systems can meet demand, smaller independent doctors and groups of doctors say they are not participating in exchange plans due to low levels of reimbursement offered by insurers.
Schulman, the Encinitas doctor, said he believes there is little question whether such a massive upheaval in the nationwide health care market will push some subscribers toward concierge practices.
“I think it could potentially drive some growth. I think the main question is: Is it going to drive some doctors out of regular practice and into concierge practice,” Schulman said.