Showing posts with label patient centered care. Show all posts
Showing posts with label patient centered care. Show all posts

Friday, September 27, 2013

VA announces award of patient-centered care contracts

WASHINGTON, D.C. – The Department of Veterans Affairs announced Sept. 19 that Veterans will have greater access to quality health care through a new initiative:  Patient-Centered Community Care.   
“PCCC is an innovative solution that helps VA medical centers continue to provide quality care efficiently,” said Secretary of Veterans Affairs Eric K. Shinseki. “This will be a valuable option for VA medical centers to use to expand our Veterans’ access to care.”
Under PCCC, VA Medical Centers will have the ability to purchase non-VA medical care for Veterans through contracted medical providers when they cannot readily provide the needed care due to geographic inaccessibility or limited capacity.  Eligible Veterans will have access to inpatient specialty care, outpatient specialty care, mental health care, limited emergency care, and limited newborn care for enrolled female Veterans following the birth of a child.
“PCCC provides a regional contracting vehicle for VA to work with local community providers to give Veterans access to high quality care,” said Dr. Robert Petzel, VA’s Under Secretary for Health.  “It will also help VA in our continued efforts to ensure timely and accessible services are provided to Veterans for non-VA medical care.”
In total, VA has awarded two contracts under PCCC, one to Health Net Federal Services LLC and another to TriWest Healthcare Alliance Corp.  These companies will set up networks in six regions covering the entire country. VA expects to have these regional contract networks available to its medical centers by the spring of 2014. The awarded contracts, estimated at $9.4 billion, include one base year and four option years.
PCCC is part of the overall Non-VA Medical Care Program. It will provide all VA facilities with an additional option to purchase non-VA medical care when required Veteran care services are unavailable within the VA medical facility or when the Veterans benefit from receiving the needed care nearer to their homes.
Among the many benefits to the Veterans and VA under these new contracts, VA will enjoy standardized health care quality metrics, timely return of medical documentation, cost avoidance with fixed rates for services across the board, guaranteed access to care, and enhanced tracking and reporting of non-VA medical care expenditures over traditional non-VA medical services.


http://www.fortcampbellcourier.com/news/article_54a18848-26ec-11e3-a556-0019bb2963f4.html

Friday, September 20, 2013

HBR: Redefining the Patient Experience with Collaborative Care


HARVARD BUSINESS REVIEW: by Leonard L. Berry and Jamie Dunham  |   9:30 AM September 20, 2013 
It’s a common patient complaint about the people involved in their care: “Sometimes the left hand doesn’t seem to know what the right hand is doing. I don’t feel everyone is working together.” To address this issue, nurses at ThedaCare employed lean techniques to create a patient-centered, team-based model that’s producing solid results.
Based in Appleton, Wisconsin, ThedaCare is a five-hospital health system with 26 clinics, other allied services, and more than 6,000 employees. It has been a pioneer in applying lean methodology in health care in order to tackle quality and cost issues. It began its lean journey in 2003 and has made considerable progress. For example, its accountable-care-organization partnership with Bellin Health, a health care system in Green Bay, Wisconsin, presently has the lowest cost per Medicare beneficiary among 32 pioneer ACOs, and the ThedaCare Physicians group was ranked first in quality performance statewide in 2013 by Consumer Reports.
ThedaCare opened its first “collaborative care” hospital unit in a medical-surgical unit at Appleton Medical Center in 2007 after 18 months of interdisciplinary planning led by nurses. A second was introduced in a medical-surgical unit at Theda Clark Hospital in Neenah in 2009, and a third in another medical-surgical unit at Appleton Medical Center in 2010. By 2013, all eight medical-surgical units in the two hospitals had been converted to the collaborative-care model.
The results to date show that the inpatient-care model is succeeding in improving safety, efficiency, and effectiveness. For the first three units, costs and length of stay declined, and quality and patient and nursing satisfaction improved. Some metrics improved immediately (within the first month); others over a period of six to nine months. A new process that required the pharmacist, rather than a nurse, to be responsible for “admission medication reconciliation” (a process that ensures that the patient’s list of medications that he or she is taking at home is accurate and can be used as a baseline for prescribing medication during his or her hospital stay) reduced the errors per patient admission to zero from between 1.25 and 1.5.
Benefits of Collaborative-Care Chart
Team Care at the Bedside
The collaborative-care model replaces inconsistent, fragmented hospital care. A bedside-care teamcomposed of a physician (“medical expert”), nurse (“care-progression manager”), pharmacist (“medication expert”), and discharge planner (“transitional-needs coordinator”) collaborates — with patient and family input — to develop a single care plan that is continuously updated in daily team huddles. On admission, the team gathers the patient history, performs a physical assessment, determines an anticipated discharge date, and works backward from this date to build a coordinated plan of care.
Using evidence-based guidelines linked to the electronic medical record, the nurse manages the patient’s care progression, and the bedside pharmacist contributes to optimizing management of the medication. The physician leads the clinical assessment and planning process but as a team member/partner. The discharge planner assists the team in devising the best transition plan post hospitalization.
traditionalvscollaborative[2]
This patient-centered approach minimizes duplication of effort, puts people in roles that leverage their skills and accelerates clinical learning as teammates teach each other. Staff use “tollgates” — purposeful timeouts that are a lean concept — to analyze the patient’s status and remove obstacles in delivering care.
Struggles — and Lessons — from the Journey
Despite the progress, the collaborative care model has had its challenges and remains a work in progress. For example, program designers learned belatedly that the new model requires a different kind of unit leader: a team-builder, coach, and mentor. A “collaborative-care spread team” consisting of clinical experts in the model, a project manager, organizational development specialists, and others guide the nurse managers through their unit’s preparation and implementation phases, supporting their leadership development every step of the way.
One challenge that’s currently being addressed is how to both maintain essential standard work across units and accommodate the requirements of clinical specialties. Some adaptation for certain patient types, like the short-stay surgical patients, has been needed to continue to meet the model goals. As with the original design, these adaptations were made using lean tools for ongoing process improvement.
Another ongoing challenge is getting private-practice physicians who use ThedaCare hospitals to fully engage. To help address this issue, hospital medical directors meet with independent physician groups to share essential elements of the model and determine how they can be applied to doctors’ workflows. (Garnering the full participation of ThedaCare-employed physicians has gone more smoothly.)
ThedaCare’s experience with collaborative care offers salient lessons:
Start from scratch. ThedaCare started by designing a new delivery process rather than adding to the existing process. Starting fresh sparks uninhibited creativity; it encourages “why can’t we” instead of “we can’t” thinking.
Follow a methodology. The design team fully used lean methods such as rapid-improvement events, value-stream maps, and visual-management concepts. That ThedaCare turned to hospital nurses to lead the program design reflects the lean tenet of asking people closest to the work to improve it. (For more information on how to apply lean techniques in health care, see this article.)
Fully use the talent. Collaborative care addresses one of health care’s greatest sources of waste and defects: the underutilization of skilled labor. Too often, highly trained staff work below their scope of expertise — for example, doctors doing what nurses not only can do but also probably do better. Nurses coordinating patients’ care progression and pharmacists managing medications represent big wins for patients and other stakeholders.
Involve the patient. The voice of the patient was a critical input in developing the collaborative-care approach. Patients participated in rapid-improvement events and were members of the development team. Patients anxious to know when they would likely go home were the impetus to providing a discharge goal on admission and focusing on the course of care needed to meet that goal. Patients voicing distrust because they were asked the same question multiple times by different clinicians during their admission laid the foundation for an admission process conducted jointly by the care team.
Invest in intentional thinking. Another lean tenet is assessment before action. Two examples: the 18 months that ThedaCare spent planning the new model and the care team huddles before, during, and after patient visits to assess and reassess the patient’s care plan.
Support strategy with infrastructure. Changes in the hospital facility were made to implement the new approach. They included converting semi-private patient rooms to private rooms and replacing the traditional nursing stations with decentralized alcoves located just outside of the patient rooms, where teams can huddle  before and after visiting patients. A whiteboard was put in the patient’s room so staff could summarize the care plan, timeline, and other relevant information for patients and families. And the supply server was redesigned so it could be restocked outside patient rooms but would be easy for care providers to access medications (kept in locked compartments) and other things. This reduces the time that it takes for nurses to gather supplies, allowing them to spend more time with patients.
Communicate quality. In general, patients have basic expectations about their hospital experience — they want reassurance that providers care about them, communicate with one another, and are competent. Involving the patient in care planning, summarizing the plan on the in-room whiteboard, and following work standards that provide reliable outcomes communicate to patients that they are receiving quality care.
The progress to date of ThedaCare’s collaborative care model is evidence that patient-centered teamwork can improve the quality and lower the cost of care.
Follow the Leading Health Care Innovation insight center on Twitter @HBRhealth. E-mail us athealtheditors@hbr.org, and sign up to receive updates here.

Sunday, July 14, 2013

Harvard Medical School Focuses on Challenge of Healthcare Innovation

Boston: The Forum on Healthcare Innovation, a collaborative effort sponsored by Harvard Medical School and Harvard Business School, has released a report highlighting the results of the first of a series of annual conferences and surveys.

Titled “5 Imperatives: Addressing Healthcare’s Innovation Challenge,” the conference report represents the views of more than 100 experts from a wide variety of areas, including academics, physicians, healthcare providers, executives, public policymakers, investors, and insurers. The report summarizes the participants’ collective insights regarding one overarching concern: How can healthcare and business leaders best encourage innovations that lead to value—that is, the most optimal outcomes relative to dollars spent?

The accompanying survey reported several startling conclusions: Twenty percent of the more than 200 senior leaders responding to the full survey strongly believed that healthcare quality in the United States was starting from only a fair or poor position and falling behind other countries.

In addition, only one percent of them held the strongly positive sentiment that this country could significantly increase value through the combination of quality pulling ahead of other industrialized nations and healthcare costs growing more slowly than general inflation.

The Forum report prescribes five key imperatives most likely to yield practical progress:

Making value the central objective: In isolation, efforts to either reduce costs or improve outcomes are insufficient; we need to do both through care coordination and shared information.
Promoting novel approaches to process improvement: In the race for new products and services, we are overlooking important opportunities for improving the ways in which we deliver care. In addition, failure, managed wisely, represents an important component of experimentation and learning.
Making consumerism really work: Consumerism remains a strong idea with weak execution. We will achieve greater success when providers organize efforts around patient needs, and when patients become more active and informed agents in managing their own health.
Decentralization: We should facilitate the movement of care delivery and healthcare innovation from centralized centers of expertise to the periphery, where more providers, innovators, and patients can engage in collaborative improvement efforts.
Integrating the Old and New: Existing healthcare institutions must be reinforced with efforts to integrate new knowledge into established organizations and the communities they serve.
According to Harvard Business School professor Robert S. Huckman, co-chair of the Forum on Healthcare Innovation, “The 5 Imperatives report is a provocative compilation of core issues that can help us focus our energy, regardless of discipline, on the most truly urgent areas of innovation.”

Added co-chair and Harvard Medical School professor Barbara J. McNeil, MD, “The report reflects in microcosm the larger possibilities of the Forum itself: the collaborative power of healthcare and business leadership to provide care in which we can have confidence, at costs we can manage.”

Harvard Medical School Focuses on Challenge of Healthcare Innovation

Monday, June 24, 2013

Collaboration Encouraged at Patient-Centered Diabetes Care Event


Published Online: Friday, June 21, 2013

A session hosted by the American Journal of Managed Care brought together an array of groups involved in managing and treating diabetes.

In order to best serve diabetes patients, all those involved in managing the condition—including physicians, pharmacists, health plans, policymakers, and drug developers—must have a seat at the table. To foster collaboration among a number of these groups, a session titled “Patient-Centered Diabetes Care: Future Directions” was held at the University of Chicago Law School on June 20. The session was hosted by the American Journal of Managed Care in conjunction with Precision Health Economics.

The event was timed to take place just before the beginning of the annual meeting of the American Diabetes Association (ADA), which is being held June 21 to 25 in Chicago. Earlier this year, the ADA announced the results of a study finding that the total economic burden of diabetes in the United States reached $245 billion in 2012, a 41% increase since 2007. In March 2013, the American Journal of Managed Care launched Evidence-Based Diabetes Management, an indexed news publication, to help create a shared forum for physicians, health plans, pharmaceutical leaders, and policymakers.

“When the ADA announced the rise in the financial and human toll that diabetes takes from our economy and from the lives of everyday Americans, it was alarming, but sadly, not entirely surprising,” said Brian Haug, president of Intellisphere Managed Markets, which publishes the American Journal of Managed Care and Evidence-Based Diabetes Management. “Because we are in close touch with the medical community and have been for nearly two decades, we were already responding to this crisis. This week’s meeting is a continuation of that response.”

The event’s keynote speaker was Anne Peters, MD, CDE, director of the clinical diabetes program at the University of Southern California. Panel discussions addressed topics including individualizing diabetes patient treatment, the effect of diabetes patient behavior on quality of care and outcomes, and methods of improving patient adherence to diabetes medications and therapies. In the closing address, Deneen Vojta, MD, senior vice president for business initiatives and clinical affairs at UnitedHealth Group, discussed how to develop relationships between health insurers and drug developers.

Pharmacists also have the potential to play an important role in improving diabetes treatment outcomes. A study published in the May 15, 2013, edition of the American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy found that type 2 diabetes patients who were treated by a team of providers including a clinical pharmacist were significantly more likely to reach blood glucose, LDL cholesterol, and blood pressure goals than those treated by a primary care physician alone. (Click here to read our article about this study.)

At Pharmacy Times, we offer regular coverage of news relating to diabetes treatment. Earlier this month, we covered a study published in BMJ finding that use of some statins can lead to increased risk of new-onset diabetes. In April, we covered the newly released diabetes treatment guidelines from the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists.

The print edition of Pharmacy Times regularly features Diabetes Watch, a round-up of notable recent studies. Our May 2013 issue included a review of diabetes apps that harness the power of mobile technology to help patients monitor and improve their condition. And, for a comprehensive look at diabetes as it relates to pharmacy, our October 2012 Diabetes Issue is an invaluable resource.


http://mobile.pharmacytimes.com/news/Collaboration-Encouraged-at-Patient-Centered-Diabetes-Care-Event

Thursday, May 30, 2013

MyMD365.com - Taking us to the "Next Generation of Patient Centered" Care

Description
Our Mission
A unique opportunity currently exists for stake holders to improve the way our nation delivers care to its citizens. The current environment of regulatory reform, shrinking budgets and increasing patient populations has created the “the perfect storm”, thus setting the stage for the  greatest disruption in the history of the healthcare industry. There has to be a delivery system that is flexible enough to meet to the needs of every consumer on their own terms. How do we provide a valuable alternative for the 26 year old waitress without health insurance, the 46 year-old lawyer who doesn't trust the system and the 63 year old self-employed artist? I believe there is, and it is MyMD365.com 

MyMD365.com
MyMD365.com  seeks to connect patients, providers, researchers, educators and tech companies through an innovative mobile network. This collaboration will provide a direct connection at the point of care through a flexible digital platform.  The end result will be  “on demand” care delivered on any internet enabled device or through ERM’s proprietary Automated Community Health Machines (ACHM). These “mini-clinics”, about the size of a photo booth will private access to primary care, preventive screenings and disease management education to anyone anywhere anytime. When all you need is power and the internet the possibilities are endless. ERM believes that shared decision making relies on patient engagement and the only road to meaningful engagement is through education. A sustainable healthcare system will only be achieved through a partnership with the consumer. Value is in the eye of the beholder and MyMD365.com provides meaningful solutions to every consumer. A positive patient/physician relationship is the greatest factor in compliance with treatment. The decision to seek or not to seek treatment is a personal one. Not one that can be dictated by big business. Thanks to the ACA, we have brought attention to the needs of certain populations like the elderly and the uninsured, but what about the insured who are turned off by the system? What are we doing to address the growing number of consumers who choose privacy over healthcare? 

The Empirical Benefits
  • Greater Consumer Experience ·  
  • Transparent Pricing
  • Flexible Delivery
  •  Access at the Point of Care ·         
  • Shared Decision Making ·
  • Whole System Change ·         
  • Data, Data, Data    

How We Got to This Point… 
Empirical Risk Management began as an “experiment” to prove the positive impact that education could have on reducing costs, engaging patients and improving the overall experience of care.  Our pilot was a huge success and the ROI was incredible, but the greatest achievement of all was seeing the hunger for knowledge and the positive impact on human life that was reflected in patient centered whole system change. Please visit our website to find out more about our pilot: www.ermconsultinginc.com 
This project extends that valuable patient/physician relationship to every consumer in the healthcare market. MyMD365.com will provide the platform necessary to launch this disruptive innovative technology into the hands of every consumer for $300 a year and as little as $25 A “virtual visit”. Consider the benefit this would allow employers to provide to their employees on any "job site". 
We know that our emotions play a significant role in the healing process. Could we reduce the time of recovery by allowing patients the comfort and security of their own bed? What about disease management? Could this be the tool that primary care providers have been looking for to encourage healthier decisions? What about monitoring changes in medication? What about the benefit of reducing of hospital admissions and re-admissions through earlier identification and prevention of exacerbations in chronic disease? 
The individual voice of a patient or a provider will never be enough, but together we can move mountains. Join our revolution, help fund the “Next Generation of Patient Centered” Care. 

The Minds Behind The Movement… 
Kameron Gifford, CPC 
Over the last twelve years, I have worked with physicians to develop efficient billing practices, implement value added processes and improve the entire experience of care for their patients. What can this knowledge contribute to developing compliant, engaging and transparent care delivery systems? 

Todd Gifford, MBA
My husband is a managed care executive with one the country's largest health plans. To him, this project represents a solution; an answer to some of healthcare's greatest barriers. But most of all he envisions a way to connect providers with their patients in real time outside of the “clinic”... a tool for chronic disease management. 

JM McCullough, MD 
My father celebrated his 70th birthday last week. He is the inspiration behind ERM's work and our proprietary model of care "The Preventist". His primary care practice is still located within 15 miles of where he completed his Residency and our average patient is an 83 years old male with 3 or more chronic conditions. His career in managed care began shortly after Reagan left office and continues today as an Associate Medical Director for a managed Medicaid plan in addition to seeing patients everyday.  His leadership and guidance was essential in creating a vehicle for the  “Next Generation of Patient-Centered”.