Showing posts with label hospital readmission rates. Show all posts
Showing posts with label hospital readmission rates. Show all posts

Sunday, August 11, 2013

U.S. government fines more than 50 Oklahoma hospitals for Medicare patient readmissions

By ZIVA BRANSTETTER World Enterprise Editor on Aug 10, 2013, at 2:22 AM  Updated on 8/10/13 at 4:15 AM

More than 50 Oklahoma hospitals, including all of Tulsa's major hospitals, have been fined by the federal government for Medicare patients who return for treatment within 30 days of an inpatient stay. 

A provision of the Affordable Care Act, the financial penalties are part of a larger effort by the federal government to pay hospitals based on the quality of care they provide rather than the number of patients they treat. The readmission penalties, also levied last year, have sparked new efforts by hospitals statewide to help patients have a smooth recovery after leaving. 

Among the Tulsa hospitals fined were St. John Medical Center, Oklahoma State University Medical Center, two Saint Francis hospitals and two Hillcrest Medical Center locations, a Tulsa World analysis of federal data shows. 

The fines come in the form of deductions ranging from zero to 2 percent from future Medicare payments to the hospital. 

The hospitals were penalized if patients treated for three conditions - heart attack, heart failure or pneumonia - were discharged and then admitted to any hospital within 30 days. 

Because the Medicare program relies on tax dollars, ultimately taxpayers face higher bills when patients are readmitted. A Medicare advisory board has estimated that avoiding one in 10 readmissions could save $1 billion or more. 

The readmission fines were levied against 2,225 hospitals nationwide, about two-thirds of all hospitals. Statewide, 53 out of 91 hospitals received penalties. 

Dr. Peter Aran, senior vice president of quality for Saint Francis Health System, said the program came about after studies showed a high number of Medicare patients returning to the hospital after inpatient stays. 

"It shocked the government that one in five patients had to come back to the hospital (within one month), and we were funding that. At the 12-month interval, one out of every two patients ... came back," Aran said. 

Cheena Pazzo, a spokeswoman for St. John Health System, said the hospital reduced its overall readmission rate by 9 percent since the last quarter of 2011 through a variety of efforts. Patients are screened for readmission risk, and complex cases receive extra follow-up, Pazzo said in an email. 

"As part of the overall effort, we are emphasizing better communication among providers, family members and caregivers so they are empowered to manage follow-up care," she said. 

The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services released data on the fines on its website last week. 

The fines vary widely by geography, with 14 of 22 hospitals in the Oklahoma City area receiving no fine and all but one receiving relatively low fines compared to Tulsa hospitals, the World's analysis shows. Midwest Regional Medical Center in Midwest City received the highest fine in that area, 0.77 percent. 

Out of 14 hospitals in Tulsa and its suburbs, six received no fine. 

A Durant hospital - the Medical Center of Southeastern Oklahoma - was among 19 hospitals in the nation to receive the full 2 percent penalty. A "60 Minutes" broadcast last year alleged the hospital and the company that owns it pressured doctors to admit patients regardless of medical need. 

Harmon Memorial Hospital in Hollis received a 1.89 percent penalty, ranking it among the 25 largest fines nationally. 

Last year, the hospital, operated by the Harmon County Healthcare Authority, and one of its doctors agreed to pay $1.5 million to settle claims of health-care fraud in the Medicare and Medicaid programs. The payment settled a whistleblower lawsuit brought by a former administrator of the authority. 

Officials with the Durant and Hollis hospitals could not be reached for comment. 

Rick Snyder, vice president of finance and information services with the Oklahoma Hospital Association, said hospitals in the state were prepared for the fines, also levied last year. 

"We've been actively working with hospitals to reduce readmissions," Snyder said. 

LaWanna Halstead, vice president of quality and clinical initiatives for the association, said 55 Oklahoma hospitals are taking part in a network focusing on 10 ways to improve patient outcomes. Those include avoiding blood clots, hospital-acquired infections and patient readmissions. 

"It's a very complicated issue," Halstead said. 

In the Tulsa area, Hillcrest Medical Center received the largest penalty, 0.62 percent of future Medicare billings. The fine was lower than last year's penalty, which was the maximum 1 percent. 

Angela Peterson, a spokeswoman for Hillcrest, said a new program at the hospital pairs registered nurses with patients who are at risk for readmission. The nurses, called Care Partners, work closely with patients to ensure they follow discharge instructions and can get to follow-up appointments. 

"Readmission to the hospital within 30 days is often not an issue of care provided in the hospital but is often the result of circumstances after a patient leaves the hospital," Peterson said. 

Saint Francis' hospitals at 61st and Yale and 10501 E. 91st St. were among Oklahoma hospitals penalized. 

Saint Francis received a penalty that represents less than half of 1 percent of all future Medicare billings in the coming fiscal year. The hospital estimates that will total about $360,000 in the next fiscal year. 

Aran said the program penalizes hospitals even if the reason for the patient's second hospital admission has nothing to do with the first admission. 

"With the readmissions program, two out of three hospitals (nationally) get penalized with this strict bar. That's why hospitals all over the country are working like we are to reduce readmission," Aran said. 

Dale Bratzler, associate dean and professor at the University of Oklahoma's College of Public Health, was among the authors of a 2011 medical study on readmissions. 

The study found that about one in five Medicare patients, 17 percent, hospitalized for pneumonia returned to the hospital within 30 days. 

Bratzler, an osteopathic physician, said readmission rates are higher for some diagnoses. One in four Medicare patients treated for heart failure return within 30 days, he said. 

To determine the readmission penalty, the federal government examines the rate at which Medicare patients with certain illnesses return to any hospital within 30 days of being treated. The rates are adjusted for patients with more severe illnesses, but some hospitals still end up on the losing end. 

"All the hospitals will tell you that if you have patients who have less access to care, they are more likely to be readmitted," Bratzler said. 

Hospitals won't be able to prevent all patients from returning after discharge but by coordinating with outside care providers, they can improve outcomes, he said. 

"Most experts feel that up to half of readmissions may be preventable with better coordination of care across settings. Again, that may vary by diagnosis. The 'correct' readmission rate is not zero, but Medicare feels that it can certainly be better than 20 percent."


Top 10 readmission fines

Here are the top 10 Oklahoma hospitals with the largest penalties for patient readmissions: 

  • Medical Center of Southeastern Oklahoma, Durant
  • Harmon Memorial Hospital, Hollis
  • Eastern Oklahoma Medical Center, Poteau
  • Pushmataha Hospital, Antlers
  • Choctaw Memorial Hospital, Hugo
  • Midwest Regional Medical Center, Midwest City
  • Pauls Valley General Hospital, Pauls Valley
  • Craig General Hospital, Vinita
  • Integris Clinton Regional Hospital, Clinton
  • Hillcrest Medical Center, Tulsa
Source: Tulsa World analysis of CMS data 

http://www.tulsaworld.com/article.aspx/US_government_fines_more_than_50_Oklahoma_hospitals/20130810_11_A1_CUTLIN269946?subj=1

Thursday, August 8, 2013

Hospitals address readmit penalties

Two area hospitals will lose a portion of Medicare reimbursements for the second consecutive year after failing to meet national average readmission rates for heart conditions and pneumonia.
Masonic Home and Hospital in Wallingford will lose 1.14 percent of its Medicare reimbursements for patient stays, a penalty levied under the federal Hospitals Readmission Reduction Program which began last year as part of the Affordable Care Act. The program penalizes hospitals for patients readmitted within 30 days.
MidState Medical Center in Meriden faces a loss of .78 percent of reimbursements but won’t lose as much money as last year since it brought down its readmissions.
Both MidState and Masonic lost 1 percent of reimbursements last year, the maximum penalty. This year the maximum was 2 percent.
Masonic officials said the readmission reduction program penalizes hospitals that take a large number of older, sicker Medicare patients. The penalties amount to about $60,000, according to Masonic spokeswoman Margaret Steeves. Masonic patients, many of whom are referred by nursing homes, are commonly 85 years or older.
Medicare reimburses hospitals for care given to patients 65 years or older. Readmission rates are compared to national averages but are adjusted for sicker and high-risk populations, according to Medicare spokeswoman Kathryn Ceja. Hospitals with higher than national average readmission rates face penalties.
Twenty-four of Connecticut’s 31 hospitals will face Medicare penalties in the fiscal year that starts in October. None of the state’s hospitals will lose the maximum amount possible.
Statewide, Connecticut’s hospitals face an average penalty of .43 percent of Medicare funds for the number of readmissions within a month, which is higher than the national average. Hospitals in 12 states, including Massachusetts and Rhode Island, face higher average penalties.
Nationally, about 20 percent of hospitalized Medicare patients are back within 30 days, at an estimated cost of $17 billion a year, according to the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission.
Hospital administrators in the state say they have made many efforts to reduce readmissions in the past two years, and note that the new penalties are based on readmissions through June 2012. Medicare counts patients who originally went into the hospital with at least one of three conditions — heart attack, heart failure or pneumonia — and landed back in the hospital within 30 days for any reason, even if it was unrelated to the original stay.
Jack Greene, Midstate Chief Medical Officer, said efforts to reduce readmission since last year have shown results. Medicare takes data from the previous three years, and efforts from last year were able to reduce the penalty by 22 percent.
“We were certainly pleased we improved from last year,” Greene said.
MidState now works more closely with visiting nurses, rehabilitation centers and patients to communicate what needs to be done after a hospital admission. Howard Dobin, director of MidState’s hospitalist program, said patients at higher risk for readmission are given additional help understanding, for instance, how to take their medication.
Dobin expects MidState’s penalty to continue to drop.
Connecticut Hospital Association officials said they’ve worked to change the federal matrix for calculating readmissions. Only patients with heart conditions or pneumonia are counted for readmissions, but any illness that lands them in the hospital will count against that medical center. That penalizes a hospital for admitting a cancer patient for regularly scheduled chemotherapy if the patient had a heart attack within 30 days.
Mary Reich Cooper, association Chief Medical Officer, said that could and should be changed.
“The federal government is starting to take into account that some readmissions are planned readmissions,” she said.
Overall, hospitals have made strides in reducing readmissions.
“We’re starting to show results,” Cooper said. “We’re really proud of all the hospitals that have improved their outcomes from a year ago.”
Readmission penalties are among a number of financial pressures weighing on hospitals in Connecticut and nationally. The federal government also is squeezing hospitals to reduce unnecessary inpatient stays, which has led to the controversial use of “observation status” as an alternative to admission. Patients who are deemed to be on observation status during a stay are not counted as admissions, but find themselves without Medicare coverage for nursing home care after discharge. That policy is being challenged in a lawsuit in federal court in Hartford.
jbuchanan@record-journal.com (203)317-2230 Twitter: @JBuchananRJ


Monday, August 5, 2013

Changes in hospital readmission rates by clinical severity

Medicare now penalizes hospitals for high readmission rates for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), congestive heart failure (CHF), and pneumonia. Anticipating the penalties,readmission rates have come down, though this does not prove a causal relationship.
medicare readmit trend
The chart illustrates a highly aggregated metric. Certainly readmission rates and changes in them vary by type of patient (in any number of dimensions). For example, recent work by Matthew Press et al. suggests that changes in readmission rates vary by condition severity.
In an analysis of Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries nationwide, we found that those with the highest clinical severity had readmission rates in 1997 that were approximately 6.0 percentage points higher than those in the lowest severity quartile, with this gap increasing to 8.1 percentage points by 2007 for AMI. The difference in readmission rates for the highest versus lowest severity quartiles for CHF was 5.7 percentage points in 1997 and 6.4 percentage points in 2007. This relatively increasing risk of readmission for the highest severity patients occurred despite the fact that average severity scores decreased within each severity quartile over the 10-year period. Length of stay and in-hospital mortality also declined for all patients; however, postdischarge mortality increased for the highest severity patients, whereas it decreased for the lowest severity patients.
The authors offer two possible explanations for these findings. First, condition severity may have worsened more than observed for high severity patients and not accounted for in the risk adjustment approach applied in the analysis. That is, the highest quartile of condition severity in 2007 may have represented sicker patients than the highest quartile in 1997 in ways that were not controlled for. Sicker patients are expected to be readmitted more. Another is that actual care delivered (e.g., quality of care transitions) worsened for higher severity patients relative to lower severity patients. This might also lead to relatively more readmissions for sicker patients.
Unfortunately, their analysis ends in 2007, well before the readmission rate reduction exhibited in aggregate since 2011 in the figure. An open question is how this downturn might have varied by condition severity.