Showing posts with label HIMSS. Show all posts
Showing posts with label HIMSS. Show all posts

Saturday, April 26, 2014

How IT is Driving Changes in Community-Based Healthcare

 

By John DeGaspari

Monday, March 10, 2014

Measuring patient engagement is a 'science,' not a 'dark art'

A new collaboration announced at HIMSS14 aims to rank all of the nation's hospitals on their patient engagement abilities, much like hospitals are now ranked for their health IT acumen or their beauty.

"The best hospitals realize the patient gets well outside the hospital," said Joanne Rohde, CEO of Axial Exchange. "They've been doing this long before Meaningful Use 1, 2 or 3 … and now it's time for the rest to catch up."
Axial Exchange, a Raleigh, N.C.-based developer of mobile engagement tools for hospitals and their patients, has been creating so-called Patient Engagement Indexes (PEIs) for specific states. At HIMSS14 last month in Orlando, the company announced a partnership with Becker's Hospital Review to expand that system to a national stage, with the rankings set to be released in May.

"Patient engagement is increasingly at the center of healthcare reform, and achieving excellence in clinical outcomes has been proven dependent upon enhanced patient involvement," said Lindsey Dunn, editor-in-chief of Becker's Hospital Review, in a press release. 

Speaking to mHealth News at HIMSS 14, Rohde said many hospitals rely on a patient portal that's nothing more than a "view into a back-office system designed by a vendor for regulatory obligations." Likewise, she said, hospitals often create websites that offer information they want to share with the public, rather than offering a link to information that patients want to see. If that's a mobile version – a huge advantage in this day of mobile consumers and health pricing transparency – the site is often clunky and underwhelming.

Rohde said hospitals need to realize that two-way communications with the patient outside the hospital – no matter where they are or what device they're using – is crucial to ensuring that patients are satisfied with the care they're getting. That translates into better Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) scores, which are used by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to determine reimbursement for Medicaid patients.

Established in 2013, the Axial Exchange PEI evaluates hospitals using publicly available data in three categories and gives each a score of 1 to 100. For example, while a hospital is expected to offer electronic access to patient health records, it would score extra points for offering resources for disease management support, including mobile tools.

The categories are defined as:

• Personal health resources (representing 50 percent of the score), based on an aggregate score for hospitals that provide any of the following: read-only Internet access to health information, mobile applications or interactive tools for managing ongoing health.

• Social engagement (25 percent of the score), based on a weighted score of hospital ratings on leading social media and consumer ratings sites.

• Patient satisfaction (25 percent of the score), measured by the HCAHPS survey, a standardized instrument for measuring patients' perspectives on hospital care that has been endorsed by the National Quality Forum.

Matt Mattox, Axial's vice president of products and marketing, said in a July 2013 interview with mHealth News that healthcare executives were mindful of the value of patient engagement, but were too busy implementing EMRs to devote the time, money and staff. Now they're feeling pressure and seeing the value.

"Patient engagement is strategic ground that the best health systems will claim in order to thrive in a profit-from-quality world. Mobile devices are quickly making an impact on how patients manage their health," he noted in a May 6, 2013 blog titled "How to Generate a 15X Return on Patient Engagement." "For a health system, not having a mobile engagement offering in 2013 may be similar to not having a corporate website in 2003. Whether healthcare systems and practices are motivated by higher margin patients, professional reputation, payment incentives – or all three – they have everything to gain from enabling superior patient engagement and everything to lose if they do not."
Rohde said healthcare executives have to understand that patient engagement can be measured.
"It's a science, not a dark art," she said. 'There's a real correlation between patient satisfaction and social media, and mHealth plays a big role in this."

Rohde is critical of hospitals and health systems who "make patient engagement the responsibility of the IT department," because that creates a separation between the patient and the clinician. She's also critical of Meaningful Use standards that compel hospitals to "just check things off a list."

She sees a national PEI as a means of shining the spotlight on innovative and successful patient engagement programs, while establishing benchmarks for hospitals and health systems looking to improve.
"At the end of the day, it's all about the patient," she said. And that may be the missing factor in many a health system's path to success.


Google Glass could be a powerful tool for disruptive innovation in healthcare.


I joined the Glass Explorer Program and have started using Google Glass with a focus on finding medical uses for this type of wearable computing technology. While I believe that it is analytics capabilities that will allow us to realize the value of health information technology, the convergence of hardware and software combined with an explosion of wearable sensor technology is providing powerful opportunities for some disruptive innovation in the healthcare marketplace and the practice of medicine.

Charles Webster, MD got me really interested in the potential with his presentation Google Glass and Healthcare Information and Workflow at the 2014 Healthcare Systems Process Improvement Conference held immediately before HIMSS 2014. Chuck has been posting about Google Glass for some time and one of his posts on the HIMSS Future Care blog is well worth reading. Some of the insights he brought in the post are:
"There’s lots of interest in Glass use by surgeons, EMTs, and nurses, for hands-free and real-time access to critical information. It’s justified. But there’s also been negative speculation about threats to patient privacy. What will patients think when they see their physician wearing Glass. In my opinion, it will become just another tool they associate with healthcare workers (less obtrusive than the head mirror that used to be a symbol of the medical profession). The bigger question should be, what will physicians and others think when they see a patient wearing Glass?"
I decided it was finally time to take the plunge and become a Google Explorer and got my Google Glass just in time for the annual HIMSS conference to end. For those who have not yet seen Google Glass or don't understand how they work, it is basically a computer strapped to your head in the form of a pair of glasses. It has a heads up display, voice activation and growing number of apps. Check out the Google Glass homepage to learn more. When you think about having all of the technology of a smartphone, and then some, incorporated into a pair of glasses it boggles the mind as to the various use cases for healthcare. I want to outline just a few and then think about what other innovative possibilities this type of technology could bring to the industry.

Last year Dr. Rafael Grossman, a surgeon and one of the Google Explorers based in Maine, used Google Glass during a Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy procedure. He was careful to not stream any sensitive data out via Google Glass and wrote about theexperience on his blog. He said, "Obviously, the one of the main concerns regarding the use of Google Glass during surgery, with live streaming of data, would be to take every measure and to ensure the privacy of the patient’s health information." Using Glass in healthcare certainly faces some serious privacy and security considerations. But this technology also seems to be very well suited to solving some vexing industry problems such as emergency medicine, some surgery applications, and telemedicine to name a f.

Steven Horng, MD MMSc at BIDMC
John Halamka, MD pointed out to me that over the past few months, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center has been the pilot site for a new approach to clinical information technology, wearable computing. In the Emergency Department, they have developed a prototype of a new information system using Google Glass, a high tech pair of glasses that includes a video camera, video screen, speaker, microphone, touch pad, and motion sensor. When a clinician walks into an emergency department room, he or she looks at a QR code on the wall. Google Glass immediately recognizes the room and then the ED Dashboard sends information about the patient that is in that room to Glass. The clinician can speak with the patient, examine the patient, and perform procedures while still seeing problems, vital signs, lab results and other data in view on the Glass screen. Beyond the technical challenges of bringing wearable computers to BIDMC, there were other concerns: protecting security, evaluating patient reaction, and ensuring clinician usability. I appreciate the measured approach BIDMC has taken in developing the potential for Google Glass and am looking forward to seeing how this works out.

An internal communication at BIDMC states that staff has definitely noticed them and responded with a mixture of intrigue and skepticism. Those who tried them on briefly did seem impressed. I would be very interested in knowing how patients respond. Already, even bars in San Francisco are banning Google Glass so I can imagine that as word gets out there will be some consternation among certain patients visiting the ER. However, they have fully integrated with their EHR's ED Dashboard using a custom application to ensure secure communication and privacy safeguards. They also replaced all the Google components on the devices so that no data travels over any Google servers and all data stays within the BIDMC firewall. They will soon begin a trial of Google Glass for all providers in the Emergency Department and study patient and clinician impressions, and the usage patterns of staff.

"Over the past 3 months, I have been using Google Glass clinically while working in the Emergency Department. This user experience has been fundamentally different than our previous experiences with Tablets and Smartphones. As a wearable device that is always on and ready, it has remarkably streamlined clinical workflows that involve information gathering," said Steven Horng, MD MMSc who teaches at Harvard Medical School and works in the ED at BIDMC. After a patient presented with a massive brain bleed and was unable to communicate information concerning medications and allergies, there was serious danger to the patient. "Google glass enabled me to view this patient’s allergy information and current medication regimen without having to excuse myself to login to a computer, or even loose eye contact. It turned out that he was also on blood thinners that needed to be emergently reversed. By having this information readily available at the bedside, we were able to quickly start both antihypertensive therapy and reversal medications for his blood thinners, treatments that if delayed could lead to permanent disability and even death. I believe the ability to access and confirm clinical information at the bedside is one of the strongest features of Google Glass," said Dr. Horng via email.

Google Glass is also being used at Rhode Island Hospital’s emergency department. As reported in the Providence Journal they will use Google Glass technology to stream live images of a patient’s medical condition to a consulting specialist located elsewhere. If this pilot is successful, project coordinator Dr. Paul Porter envisions an ambulance crew someday responding to a stroke victim, using the eyeglass technology to provide real-time video and audio to a neurologist back at the hospital who could then order a clot-busting, brain-saving drug immediately. "That would be like the Holy Grail," says Porter."“But we’re just at the beginning; you have to start somewhere."

Hospital spokeswoman Ellen Slingsby says the emergency room sees about 100 patients a month with skin afflictions who require a dermatological consult. That should be a sufficient pool of prospective volunteers, Porter says, to adequately test Glass in the next six months. The team proposed the research to the hospital and later received funding for the project and so far the results are encouraging. They are using a solution from start-up technology company Pristine which created a Google Glass application that protects patients and meets federal laws for privacy so that no images or videos can be saved to the device.


RI Hospital begins using Google Glass technology

Pristine makes the app EyeSight, which enables physicians and nurses to transmit live video and audio of wound patients from Google Glass to authorized computers, smartphones and tablets. Since last October, Pristine has also been testing EyeSight through a pilot program with surgeons and anesthesiologists at UC-Irvine. The technology allows for more effective communication between UCI anesthesiologists and surgeons in the OR and allows for greater supervision of doctors-in-training. "We could be supervising two residents at the same time," says anesthesiologist Leslie Garson. Garson also said Glass has proved useful during the 15 or so surgeries he has worked on so far, especially because he often monitors two or even three surgeries simultaneously.

"A resident could have Google Glass on, they could be looking at a monitor, and I could have a tablet down the hall and could see exactly what they're seeing," he said. "They can send me an alert -- 'Take a look at this,' 'Is this something I should be concerned about?'"

Dr. Patrick Hu (pictured at left) is an anesthesiologist at UC-Irvine and can share EKG information with other doctors via Google Glass. UCI Medical Center's anesthesiology department has been instrumental in pushing for this technology, according to the hospital.


At UC San Francisco cardiothoracic surgeon Pierre Theodore, MD is using Google Glass during surgery. pre-loads CT and X-ray images needed for a procedure, and calls them up in his Google Glass to compare a medical scan with the actual surgical site. "Often one will remove a tumor that may be deeply hidden inside an organ – the liver, the lung – for example," said Dr. Theodore, who’s also an associate professor in the UCSF School of Medicine. "To be able to have those X-rays directly in your field without having to leave the operating room or to log on to another system elsewhere, or to turn yourself away from the patient in order to divert your attention, is very helpful in terms of maintaining your attention where it should be, which is on the patient 100 percent of the time." 

He is the first surgeon to receive clearance for the use of the tech device as an auxiliary surgical tool in the operating room by a local Institutional Review Board (IRB), an independent ethical review board designated to approve, monitor and review biomedical research involving human subjects. He was introduced to the idea by Nate Gross, M.D., co-founder and medical director of Rock Health, a San Francisco-based digital health accelerator. Last summer Rock Health's 5th class had a few winners who are focused on Google Glass and the digital health sensor market.Other uses for this technology begin to stretch the bounds of my imagination. Just about anything we are using mobile devices for in providing healthcare could be possibilities for using this type of technology. Bedside medication verification, accessing patient health information, and overlaying information at the point of care, as well as all of the interesting pilots underway now. I am just getting started using my pair of Google Glasses and connecting with folks in the healthcare industry who are pioneering this technology. The next couple years will be some exciting times on this front. I'd love to get your thoughts on what some of the challenges and opportunities are in using Google Glass in healthcare.

http://www.ahier.net/2014/03/google-glass-in-medicine.html

Monday, March 3, 2014

Malcolm Gladwell Keynotes Healthcare Data Interoperability Summit

The global narrative for “digital health” is relatively easy because the opportunities are so enormous. The only real limit is our imagination. Some of the more recent developments have been breathtaking – and include everything from genomics and personalized medicine to 3-D printing to putting healthcare literally in the palm of our hands (or the embedded sensors we will all wear or consume). At the core of it all is a single strategic component – data.
But the challenges are equally enormous – and nowhere is that more evident than data interoperability. This key alignment is at the heart of enormous (often competing) financial interests, true patient engagement and the health (both financial and clinical) of nations – including our own. The lack of this alignment is more than just inconvenient because it often results in gross inefficiencies, fraud, misaligned incentives and errors – all of which result in outcomes that are more expensive and less than desirable (including death).
There were a fair number of healthcare events last month including the largest healthcare IT event of the year – HIMSS. Now in its 53rd year, HIMSS attendance is nearing 40,000 with about 1,000 vendors and hundreds of educational tracks – all of which descended on Orlando, Florida for the better part of last week. As the CEO of Aetna Aetna, Mark Bertolini’s keynote stood out (here) and Hillary Clinton was standing room only.
But HIMSS wasn’t the only significant event last month. There was a second, smaller event that took place in the nation’s O.R. of healthcare policy – Washington, D.C.
Sponsored by West Health Institute (previous coverage by Forbes colleague Zina Moukheiber here), the daylong event – Health Care Innovation Day – was notable for three reasons. First, it had a singular focus on healthcare data interoperability; second because it was co-sponsored by the Office of the National Coordinator (ONC); and third because it included a compelling keynote by master storyteller and serial-bestselling author Malcolm Gladwell.
MG2
Gladwell’s latest book – David and Goliath – is the biblical metaphor for many modern endeavors and industries – including, of course, healthcare. In fact, the event itself was a kind of David in the shadows of the HIMSS Goliath.
Gladwell’s healthcare credentials are often overlooked but he did reference them in his opening remarks. From 1987 to 1996 he covered the healthcare industry for the Washington Post and so he openly wondered what his coverage would have been in his former capacity.
He often generates controversy, but whatever else, he is a master storyteller and there were three compelling vignettes for this keynote. They weren’t cut from healthcare cloth, but an opening line helped to frame their relevance.
But I’m only going to spend a little time talking about healthcare proper – both because I think  it’s often more useful to approach some of these issues from an angle by looking at the world outside of the one you’re engaged in – and secondly because I have a rule that I never talk about something my audience knows more about than I do. Malcolm Gladwell – Author
It’s that skewed angle – punctuated with relevant stories – as told by a master storyteller – that really puts Gladwell at the forefront as a speaker. Relative to data interoperability, Gladwell recounted the stories to help “reframe” the data interoperability dialog that continues to gridlock much of the healthcare industry – and the promise of digital health.
The first was The Beqaa Valley Turkey Shoot in reference to the rapid defeat of Syria by Israeli air supremacy in 1982. The swift and decisive victory was orchestrated by bringing different technologies together in a new and far more integrated way.
Using drones, AWAC’s and laser-guided missiles, the Israeli’s were among the first to carefully orchestrate their coordinated use in real time. The Israeli’s didn’t invent any of the component technologies, but they “integrated” their use in a new way that revolutionized military strategy with an exponentially lethal capacity.
The second story was The Shipping Container and recounted the story of Malcolm McLean – who revolutionized the shipping industry. He didn’t invent the shipping container, but he re-framed the problem in a way that transformed both domestic and international shipping.
By standardizing all of the components (containers, trucks, trailers, railways, docks, cranes and ships) in a new way (Lego at an industrialized scale), he effectively reduced the cost of loading and unloading from $5.50 a ton to $0.15 a ton. From his recognition that the problem required a broader systemic solution (not a component solution in isolation), domestic and international trade mushroomed exponentially.
The third story was The MP3 Player and how digitizing music revolutionized every aspect of the music industry. The effect of digitizing music was to make it interchangeable and interoperable. Almost overnight, music was transformed from being an album and episodic experience into one of personal and continuous use. Individual devices like record, cassette and CD “players” artificially constrained the way music was consumed.
Music stores, a dominate part of the retail landscape (and music experience) disappeared entirely within about 5 years. By un-tethering music from a rigid distribution model around proprietary formats, music enjoyment and sales exploded. From 2000 to 2010, growth in live performances and album sales both tripled.
In all three cases, it’s the combined interoperability that has the truly disruptive and exponential effect. The underlying component technology isn’t always a new invention  or exponentially disruptive.
“Sometimes when we look at innovation we make the mistake of thinking that innovation is specific to an individual invention or device. But all of those [individual] views miss the greatest transformation that’s brought about by technology – and that’s when you bring these various pieces and have them work together in combination – it’s the synergies between these tools that bring about the greatest changes in the world that we live in. You are on to something very crucial here – and I wish you all the best.” Malcolm Gladwell – Author
The urgent need for interoperability in healthcare is well understood. It could well be that interoperability isn’t the biggest problem in healthcare today  it’s just the first.
The HCI-DC conference was really designed to emphasize and accelerate the much needed national dialogue on driving medical interoperability to enable a smarter healthcare system across all the different interests. Ultimately, we’re all patients and we all deserve better care than the chaotic, proprietary and unconnected system we experience today. Together, we are working with key stakeholders to transform healthcare delivery in this country to make high-quality healthcare more accessible at a lower cost.” Nick Valeriani – CEO, Gary and Mary West Health Institute
The archived content for the day long event Sponsored by West Health and ONC (including Gladwell’s keynote) is now available in it’s entirety online (free but registration required) here.