Tuesday, May 14, 2013

Codesmart(TM) Group's CODESMART(TM) UNIVERSITY Clinician ICD-10 Courses Receive Approval for Continuing Education


Codesmart(TM) University Setting Industry Standards for ICD-10 Accreditation

NEW YORK, May 14, 2013 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- First Independence Corp, with its subsidiary, The Codesmart™ Group, Inc. (OTCQB:FICF) (collectively, "Codesmart™"), a newly publicly traded ICD-10 education and solutions group that offers CODESMART™ UNIVERSITY, its on-line training solution and customizable training solutions, announces today that its CODESMART™ UNIVERSITY programs of study are now eligible for Continuing Education Units ("CEU") for existing coders, as certified by the two major certification bodies for medical coding, the Association of Professional Coders ("APPC") and the American Health Information Management Association ("AHIMA").
"With the two best recognized licensing organizations offering CEU credit, which medical coder members are required to obtain on a yearly basis in order to maintain their certifications, this is an acknowledgement that CODESMART™ UNIVERSITY may be considered the "Gold Standard" of ICD-10 education," said Ira Shapiro, Chairman and CEO of Codesmart™. "Our methodology is integrated and flexible and it allows for any kind of adult learner to succeed in learning this information in any of our programs of study whether they are physicians, nurses, medical coders, or a new student looking to embark on a career in medical coding."
ICD-10, or the tenth revision of the International Classification of Diseases is a World Health Organization-approved designation of the aspects of disease treatment that include categories of diseases and treatment modalities for them, broken down into more than 141,000 designations. The previous ICD had only 17,000 codes, diagnoses and procedures. The United States is among the last countries in the world to adopt these standards, but the Department of Health and Human Services has mandated that all medical practices, hospitals and other medical record keeping organization be trained and ICD-10 compliant by October 1, 2014. This is essential as the Center for Medicare and Medicaid services will also be adopting the ICD-10 standard and will require proper medical coding in order to provide reimbursement.
AAPC was founded in 1988 to provide education and professional certification to physician-based medical coders and to elevate the standards of medical coding by providing student training, certification, ongoing education, networking, and job opportunities. Since then, AAPC has expanded beyond coding to include training and credentials in documentation and coding audits, regulatory compliance, and physician practice management. Currently, AAPC has a membership base of 121,000 worldwide, of which more than 90,000 are certified.
AAPC credentialed coders have proven mastery of all code sets, evaluation and management principles, and documentation guidelines. CPC's and other AAPC credentialed coders represent the best in outpatient coding.
Celebrating its 85th anniversary this year, the AHIMA represents more than 67,000 educated health information management professionals in the United States and around the world. AHIMA is committed to promoting and advocating for high quality research, best practices and effective standards in health information and to actively contributing to the development and advancement of health information professionals worldwide. AHIMA's enduring goal is quality healthcare through quality information.
About First Independence Corp. and The Codesmart Group, Inc.
First Independence Corp, with its subsidiary, The Codesmart™ Group, Inc. (OTCQB:FICF) is a premier national subject matter expert for ICD-10 education and compliance in the United States. Its product, CODESMART™ UNIVERSITY is an on-line program of study for existing coders, new coders, clinicians, and healthcare roles of all types. Created by a combination of a leading panel of ICD-10 subject matter experts and a major four-year accredited University, which contributed the nation's top course designers and a platform that already provides interactive education to more than 60,000 students per year in degree programs. The ICD-10 training also includes live professors who work with and guide students through the programs of study in ICD-10.
CODESMART™ UNIVERSITY is endorsed by over 60 colleges and Universities nationwide for their quality of education. The CODESMART™ Group, Inc. also provides solutions for ICD-10 transitions, outsource coding, coding audits, critical documentation improvement and the revenue cycle continuum. To learn more about CODESMART™ UNIVERSITY's proprietary programs, visit www.codesmartuniversity.org.
CONTACT: Company Contact:
         Ira Shapiro
         CEO and Chairman
         First Independence Corp.The Codesmart Group, Inc.ishapiro@codesmartgroup.com
         646-526-7867

         Investor Contact:
         David Brionesdbriones@briofinancial.com
         908-370-5102


Read more: http://www.nasdaq.com/article/codesmarttm-groups-codesmarttm-university-clinician-icd-10-courses-receive-approval-for-continuing-education-units-by-top-two-medical-coding-associations-20130514-00463#ixzz2TKQwaj8X

U.S. charges 89 people with healthcare fraud


U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder refers to his notes during testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Capitol Hill in Washington, March 6, 2013. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst
U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder refers to his notes during testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Capitol Hill in Washington, March 6, 2013.
Credit: Reuters/Jonathan Ernst
WASHINGTON | Tue May 14, 2013 4:26pm EDT
(Reuters) - U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder said on Tuesday the Department of Justice had charged 89 defendants in eight cities with healthcare fraud, and warned that budget cuts could limit future efforts to crack down on fraudulent claims.
The government's sixth national crackdown on healthcare fraud since 2010 involved $223 million in fraudulent claims in jurisdictions including Miami, Detroit, Los Angeles and Brooklyn, New York, the Justice Department said.
But Holder said efforts to expand the battle against fraud is being affected by automatic across-the-board federal budget cuts, known as sequestration, which have stripped $1.6 billion in funding from the Justice Department for the fiscal year ending September 30.
"Unless Congress adopts a balanced deficit reduction plan and stops the reductions currently slated for 2014, I fear our capacity to protect the American people from healthcare fraud ... will be further reduced," Holder said.
Since 2007, officials say the government's Medicare Fraud Strike Force has charged more than 1,500 defendants who have falsely billed the Medicare program for the elderly and disabled for $5 billion.
(Reporting By Susan Heavey and David Morgan; Editing by Sandra Maler and John Wallace)

NHS clinicians save up to 45 minutes a day through simplified access to patient data


Even in some of the most digitally advanced hospitals and clinics I visit, I frequently hear clinicians grousing about access to patient care data and systems. It’s not unusual for todays’ healthcare settings to have multiple repositories of patient data in different departmental systems like admissions, lab, radiology, and pharmacy. Doctors and nurses complain about all the time they spend logging into and out of various applications over and over again as they go about their clinical day. Sometimes this involves using different passwords for different applications. Things can get even more complicated as clinicians move from one area of the hospital to another, and especially from one device to another such as moving from a desktop, to a tablet or maybe a smartphone. All of this takes away precious time in caring for their patients. But what if they could avoid all that by using a desktop solution that simplified access to multiple applications and patient records, and was even capable of following the clinician across multiple devices? Even better, what if that solution actually did save time, on average 30 to 45 minutes per day! That is just what has happened  with a solution developed by Microsoft and OCSL, a long term supplier of IT solutions to the healthcare sector, for Luton and Dunstable NHS Foundation Trust Hospital in the UK.
imageLocated in Bedfordshire, Luton and Dunstable Hospital houses 700 beds with over 4,000 members of staff. The solution developed for the hospital by Microsoft andOCSL is called asseSSOnce. It provides users with one clinical desktop solution that layers over all existing applications. It is capable of working across desktop, laptop and tablet devices and creates a virtual desktop that allows session persistence from the office, to the patients’ bedsides, to the outpatients’ clinic. This makes it easier for clinicians to securely access data while making their rounds, confident that the information they are acting on remains consistent across devices. This mobile device-neutral environment also provides a starting platform for the hospital’s Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) scheme and allows it to push ahead with plans to provide clinicians with tablet devices that can provide the interface via Windows 8 to the clinical teams.
imageimageMark England, Director of Information Management and Technology, Luton and Dunstable NHS Hospital, said: “Speaking to staff we found that their biggest frustration was having to enter a password and select the patient for every system. acceSSOnce eliminates this time consuming process and makes it much simpler to securely access information when moving around the hospital. This improves the lives of our clinicians and increases the amount of time they can spend treating patients and providing care. On top of this we can take a stronger line with regard to information security and governance as we now have a much improved audit trail on access to our applications. acceSSOnce has revolutionized how we look at results. Instead of logging onto different systems, we log in once and look at all of the results in one go, saving us time and making us more efficient. Any additional time saved by being able to manage patients more efficiently means we’ll have more time to ensure we’re discharging our patients safely.”
imageJane Ayres, Director of OCSL, said: “As Luton and Dunstable has shown, acceSSOnce can have a significant impact on the lives of clinicians. Forty-five minutes a day could translate to three additional patient visits. Over the course of a year, that means one clinician could treat roughly 800 more patients. Multiply that across the hospital’s entire clinical staff and that number grows exponentially again. At a time when budgets are being continually squeezed, acceSSOnce offers a simple way to improve productivity and patient care, by alleviating the administrational burden of those on the frontline.”
When it comes to driving adoption of IT solutions that impact clinical workflow, nothing is more important than delighting end-users. Solutions that add work and take away time from patient care will always be unpopular with clinical staff. I’ve always found that giving back time is its own reward—a reward that is always welcomed by busy doctors, nurses and other clinicians.

What are the Financial and Operational Impacts of ICD-10?




At the Becker's Hospital Review Annual Meeting in Chicago on May 11, Deborah Grider, senior manager of revenue cycle at Blue and Co., and Laura DeBusk, senior director of business development at White Plume Technologies, discussed the financial and operational impact of ICD-10.

According to Ms. Grider, the only way for healthcare organizations to minimize financial losses is to document properly. "Documentation drives everything," she said. Currently, common problems in documentation include lack of specificity and illegible physician handwriting. Physicians need to be trained to be able to document effectively for ICD-10. Clinician documentation improvement programs should include a physician advisor to help train, and education opportunities for ICD-10 should be maximized in those programs. "Ultimately, documentation translates to revenue," she said.

Operationally, the dip in physician productivity is going to be the hardest thing for healthcare organizations to deal with. Ms. DeBusk also warned that clinicians will have to be trained so as to be able to use the new technology and new coding, and the processes that they had been using, that have become almost muscle memory to them, will have to be thrown out the window. Nurses will have to learn how to document with new types of forms, and front desk staff will have to learn how to use new technology. "With ICD-10, for the first time, paper won't be faster than computers," Ms. DeBusk said.

Another operational impact that organizations will face is payor readiness for ICD-10, said Ms. DeBusk. Most payors say they will meet the deadline, but some may not, and organizations need to figure out if their payor will be ready. As payors make changes to their systems, operations will slow down on their end as well, which organizations will have to prepare for. Ensure that your healthcare organization knows how to respond to payor issues with ICD-10, she said.
© Copyright ASC COMMUNICATIONS 2012.

Senators Want Provider Feedback on Medicare Payments

Senators Want Provider Feedback on Medicare Payments


Senators Want Provider Feedback on Medicare Payments

Margaret Dick Tocknell, for HealthLeaders Media , May 14, 2013

Leaders of the Senate Finance Committee are asking doctors to answer questions about the physician fee schedule and changes that would be necessary to accommodate alternative payment models.
In advance of a "doc fix" repeal hearing scheduled for Tuesday, the Senate Finance Committee has reached out to more than 100 healthcare providers for specific recommendations on how to improve Medicare's physician payment system.
In a co-signed letter Sen. Max Baucus (D-MT), committee chair, and Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-UT), ranking member, call for "a permanent solution that will address the SGR and physician payment reform."  
Physicians face a 25% payment reduction in 2014 under the current sustainable growth rate formula. Congress has tried and failed to repeal it for years.
The senators are looking to healthcare providers for help, emphasizing that "comments containing specific suggestions will be the most valuable to the committee." Physicians and other providers are asked to respond to three questions:
  1. What specific reforms should be made to the physician fee schedule to ensure that physician services are valued appropriately?
  2. What specific policies should be implemented that could co-exist with the current FFS physician payment system and would identify and reduce unnecessary utilization to improve health and reduce Medicare spending growth?
  3. Within the context of the current FFS system, how specifically can Medicare most effectively incentivize physician practices to undertake the structural, behavioral and other changes needed to participate in alternative payment models?
Stakeholders have until May 31 to provide responses. What happens after that is anyone's guess. No timetable for future action has been released.
Although there is widespread agreement that the SGR is flawed and needs to be replaced, In a longstanding delay tactic,  Congress has long opted to intervene on an annual basis to prevent physician payment cuts rather than develop a permanent solution. A bipartisan-sponsored  repeal bill introduced in February has the support of  the AMA and the American Academy of Family Physicians among other key physicians groups.


A Congressional Budget Office analysis released in February 2013 slashed $107 billion from the cost of eliminating the SGR and is credited with resuscitating efforts to repeal the unpopular formula. Whether the seemingly significant financial incentive is enough to overturn the SGR remains to be seen.
Last week the House Ways and Means subcommittee on Health spent several hours exchanging ideas about reforming the SGR with a group of influential healthcare stakeholders. At this point it's difficult to imagine what new information remains to be discovered.
The House Ways and Means Committee sent a similar letter in April 2012 to the American Medical Association and the Medical Group Management Association. In their responses, the AMA and MGMA identified possible alternative payment models, including performance-based and bundled payments.
Baucus and Hatch hosted a number of roundtables about Medicare payments in 2012 that featured physicians, former administrators of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, and private payers. While those meetings covered a wide range of topics, including models of care, specialty reimbursements, and quality and efficiency, no magic bullets were identified.

Margaret Dick Tocknell is a reporter/editor with HealthLeaders Media. 

Expanded Coverage for Diabetes Outpatient Self- Management Training Services and Supporting Regulations (CMS-R-247)


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services
[Document Identifiers: CMS–R–70, CMS–R–
72, CMS–R–247, CMS–10287, CMS–R–43,
CMS–855(POH), CMS–2552–10, and CMS–
10062]
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request
AGENCY: Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services, HHS.
In compliance with the requirement
of section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services (CMS) is publishing the
following summary of proposed
collections for public comment.
Interested persons are invited to send
comments regarding this burden
estimate or any other aspect of this
collection of information, including any
of the following subjects: (1) The
necessity and utility of the proposed
information collection for the proper
performance of the agency’s functions;
(2) the accuracy of the estimated
burden; (3) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and (4) the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology to
minimize the information collection
burden.
1. Type of Information Collection
Request: Reinstatement with a change of
a previously approved collection; Title
of Information Collection: Information
Collection Requirements in HSQ–110,
Acquisition, Protection and Disclosure
of Peer review Organization Information
and Supporting Regulations in 42 CFR,
Sections 480.104, 480.105, 480.116, and
480.134; Use: The Peer Review
Improvement Act of 1982 authorizes
quality improvement organizations
VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:05 May 09, 2013 Jkt 229001 PO 00000 Frm 00037 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\10MYN1.SGM 10MYN1 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register /Vol. 78, No. 91 / Friday, May 10, 2013 /Notices 27401
(QIOs), formally known as peer review
organizations (PROs), to acquire
information necessary to fulfill their
duties and functions and places limits
on disclosure of the information. The
QIOs are required to provide notices to
the affected parties when disclosing
information about them. These
requirements serve to protect the rights
of the affected parties. The information
provided in these notices is used by the
patients, practitioners and providers to:
obtain access to the data maintained and
collected on them by the QIOs; add
additional data or make changes to
existing QIO data; and reflect in the
QIO’s record the reasons for the QIO’s
disagreeing with an individual’s or
provider’s request for amendment.:
Form Number: CMS–R–70 (OCN: 0938–
0426); Frequency: Reporting—On
occasion; Affected Public: Business or
other for-profits; Number of
Respondents: 400; Total Annual
Responses: 21,200; Total Annual Hours:
42,400. (For policy questions regarding
this collection contact Coles Mercier at
410–786–2112. For all other issues call
410–786–1326.)
2. Type of Information Collection
Request: Reinstatement without change
of a previously approved collection;
Title of Information Collection:
Information Collection Requirements in
42 CFR 478.18, 478.34, 478.36, 478.42,
QIO Reconsiderations and Appeals; Use:
In the event that a beneficiary, provider,
physician, or other practitioner does not
agree with the initial determination of a
Quality Improvement Organization
(QIO) or a QIO subcontractor, it is
within that party’s rights to request
reconsideration. The information
collection requirements at 42 CFR
478.18, 478.34, 478.36, and 478.42,
contain procedures for QIOs to use in
reconsideration of initial
determinations. The information
requirements contained in these
regulations are imposed on QIOs to
provide information to parties
requesting the reconsideration. These
parties will use the information as
guidelines for appeal rights in instances
where issues are actively being
disputed. Form Number: CMS–R–72
(OCN: 0938–0443); Frequency:
Reporting—On occasion; Affected
Public: Individuals or Households and
Business or other for-profit institutions;
Number of Respondents: 2,590; Total
Annual Responses: 5,228; Total Annual
Hours: 2,822. (For policy questions
regarding this collection contact Coles
Mercier at 410–786–2112. For all other
issues call 410–786–1326.)
3. Type of Information Collection
Request: Reinstatement with a change of
a previously approved collection; Title
of Information Collection: Expanded
Coverage for Diabetes Outpatient Self-
Management Training Services and
Supporting Regulations Contained in 42
CFR 410.141, 410.142, 410.143, 410.144,
410.145, 410.146, 414.63; Use:
According to the National Health and
Nutrition Examination Survey
(NHANES), as many as 18.7 percent of
Americans over age 65 are at risk for
developing diabetes. The goals in the
management of diabetes are to achieve
normal metabolic control and reduce
the risk of micro- and macro-vascular
complications. Numerous epidemiologic
and interventional studies point to the
necessity of maintaining good glycemic
control to reduce the risk of the
complications of diabetes. Despite this
knowledge, diabetes remains the leading
cause of blindness, lower extremity
amputations and kidney disease
requiring dialysis. Diabetes and its
complications are primary or secondary
factors in an estimated 9 percent of
hospitalizations (Aubert, RE, et al.,
Diabetes-related hospitalizations and
hospital utilization. In: Diabetes in
America. 2nd ed. National Institutes of
Health, National Institute of Diabetes
and Digestive and Kidney Disease, NIH,
Pub. No 95–1468–1995: 553–570).
Overall, beneficiaries with diabetes are
hospitalized 1.5 times more often than
beneficiaries without diabetes. HCFA–
3002–F ‘‘Expanded Coverage for
Outpatient Diabetes Self-Management
Training and Diabetes Outcome
Measurements’’, provided for uniform
coverage of diabetes outpatient selfmanagement
training services. These
services include educational and
training services furnished to a
beneficiary with diabetes by an entity
approved to furnish the services. The
physician or qualified non-physician
practitioner treating the beneficiary’s
diabetes would certify that these
services are needed as part of a
comprehensive plan of care. This rule
established the quality standards that an
entity would be required to meet in
order to participate in furnishing
diabetes outpatient self-management
training services. It set forth payment
amounts that have been established in
consultation with appropriate diabetes
organizations. It implements section
4105 of the Balanced Budget Act of
1997. Form Number: CMS–R–247 (OCN:
0938–0818); Frequency: Recordkeeping
and Reporting—Occasionally; Affected
Public: Business or other for-profit
institutions; Number of Respondents:
5327; Total Annual Responses: 63,924;
Total Annual Hours: 197,542. (For
policy questions regarding this
collection contact Kristin Shifflett at
410–786–4133. For all other issues call
410–786–1326.)
4. Type of Information Collection
Request: Extension of a currently
approved collection; Title of
Information Collection: Medicare
Quality of Care Complaint Form; Use: In
accordance with Section 1154(a)(14) of
the Social Security Act, Quality
Improvement Organizations (QIOs) are
required to conduct appropriate reviews
of all written complaints submitted by
beneficiaries concerning the quality of
care received. The Medicare Quality of
Care Complaint Form will be used by
Medicare beneficiaries to submit quality
of care complaints. This form will
establish a standard form for all
beneficiaries to utilize and ensure
pertinent information is obtained by
QIOs to effectively process these
complaints. Form Number: CMS–10287
(OCN: 0938–1102); Frequency:
Reporting—Occasionally; Affected
Public: Individuals or Households;
Number of Respondents: 3,500; Total
Annual Responses: 3,500; Total Annual
Hours: 583. (For policy questions
regarding this collection contact Coles
Mercier at 410–786–2112. For all other
issues call 410–786–1326.)
5. Type of Information Collection
Request: Reinstatement with change of a
currently approved collection; Title of
Information Collection: Conditions of
Participation for Portable X-ray
Suppliers and Supporting Regulations
in 42 CFR Sections 486.104, 486.106,
486.110; Use: The requirements
contained in this information collection
request are classified as conditions of
participation or conditions for coverage.
These conditions are based on a
provision specified in law relating to
diagnostic X-ray tests ‘‘furnished in a
place of residence used as the patient’s
home,’’ and are designed to ensure that
each supplier has a properly trained
staff to provide the appropriate type and
level of care, as well as, a safe physical
environment for patients. CMS uses
these conditions to certify suppliers of
portable X-ray services wishing to
participate in the Medicare program.
This is standard medical practice and is
necessary in order to help to ensure the
well-being, safety and quality
professional medical treatment
accountability for each patient. Form
Number: CMS–R–43 (OCN: 0938–0338);
Frequency: Yearly; Affected Public:
Business or other for-profit and Not-forprofit
institutions; Number of
Respondents: 578; Total Annual
Responses: 578; Total Annual Hours:
948. (For policy questions regarding this
collections contact Alesia Hovatter at
410–786–6861. For all other issues call
410–786–1326.)
VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:05 May 09, 2013 Jkt 229001 PO 00000 Frm 00038 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\10MYN1.SGM 10MYN1 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
27402 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 91 / Friday, May 10, 2013 / Notices
6. Type of Information Collection
Request: New collection (Request for a
new OMB control number); Title of
Information Collection: Annual Report
of Physician-Owned Hospital
Ownership and/or Investment Interest;
Use: Section 6001 of the Affordable Care
Act (ACA) requires Medicare hospitals
to report whether they have any
physician owners including
immediately family members of the
physician.
Currently the CMS 855A captures
basic ownership/managerial information
on providers. The CMS 855A was
revised in July 2011 and a specific
attachment designed to capture
physician-owned hospital ownership
and investment interest data was added
to the form. The attachment is being
removed from the CMS 855A
application because the annual
reporting requirement for physicianowned
hospitals is not required for
Medicare enrollment processing. This
physician-owned hospital data
collection is mandated to be reported on
an annual basis. Additionally, the ACA
prohibits the expansion of current
physician-owned hospitals and banned
the establishment of new ones making
the CMS 855A the improper method to
collect this required annual report.
CMS is requesting the physicianowned
hospital ownership information,
investment information or both,
previously collected in Attachment 1 of
the CMS 855A enrollment application to
become a stand-alone form with a
unique OMB number for the following
reasons:
• The physician-owned data
collection has a small targeted audience
of approximately 140 physician-owned
hospitals nationwide.
• The physician-owned data
collection is required annually, as noted
above.
• The data required under section
6001 is more specific than the data
currently collected on the CMS–855A
provider enrollment application.
• The data is not required for
Medicare provider enrollment purposes.
Form Number: CMS–855 (POH)(OCN:
0938-New); Frequency: Reporting—
Yearly; Affected Public: Private Sector—
Business or other for-profits and not-forprofit
institutions; Number of
Respondents: 140; Total Annual
Responses: 140; Total Annual Hours:
140. (For policy questions regarding this
collection contact Kim McPhillips at
410–786–5374. For all other issues call
410–786–1326.)
7. Type of Information Collection
Request: Revision of a currently
approved collection; Title of
Information Collection: Hospital and
Health Care Complexes and Supporting
Regulations in 42 CFR 413.20 and
413.24; Use: Medicare Part A
institutional providers must provide
adequate cost data to receive Medicare
reimbursement (42 CFR 413.24(a)).
Providers must submit the cost data to
their Medicare Fiscal Intermediary (FI)/
Medicare Administrative Contractor
(MAC) through the Medicare cost report
(MCR). We are submitting a revision of
the Hospital and Hospital Health Care
Complex Cost Report, Form CMS–2552–
10. Form CMS 2552–10 is used by
hospitals participating in the Medicare
program to report the health care costs
to determine the amount of
reimbursable costs for services rendered
to Medicare beneficiaries. The revisions
were caused by legislative requirements
in the Patient Protection and Affordable
Care Act of 2010 and the Temporary
Payroll Tax Cut Continuation Act of
2011. Form Number: CMS–2552–10
(OCN: 0938–0050); Frequency:
Reporting—Yearly; Affected Public:
Private Sector—Business or other forprofits
and not-for-profit institutions;
Number of Respondents: 6,171; Total
Annual Responses: 6,171; Total Annual
Hours: 4,153,083. (For policy questions
regarding this collection contact Nadia
Massuda at 410–786–5834. For all other
issues call 410–786–1326.)
8. Type of Information Collection
Request: Reinstatement with change of a
previously approved collection. Title of
Information Collection: Collection of
Diagnostic Data from Medicare
Advantage Organizations for Risk
Adjusted Payments. Use: CMS will use
the data to make risk adjusted payment
under Parts C. MA and MA–PD plans
will use the data to develop their Parts
C bids. As required by law, CMS also
annually publishes the risk adjustment
factors for plans and other interested
entities in the Advance Notice of
Methodological Changes for MA
Payment Rates (every February) and the
Announcement of Medicare Advantage
Payment Rates (every April). Lastly,
CMS issues monthly reports to each
individual plan that contains the CMS–
HCC and RxHCC models’ output and the
risk scores and reimbursements for each
beneficiary that is enrolled in their plan.
Form Number: CMS–10062 (OMB 0938–
0838). Frequency: Quarterly. Affected
Public: Private Sector (business or other
for-profit and not-for-profit institutions).
Number of Respondents: 766. Total
Annual Responses: 830,000. Total
Annual Hours: 40,650. (For policy
questions regarding this collection
contact Michael Massimini at 410–786–
1566. For all other issues call 410–786–
1326.)
To obtain copies of the supporting
statement and any related forms for the
proposed paperwork collections
referenced above, access CMS’ Web site
address at http://www.cms.hhs.gov/
PaperworkReductionActof1995, or
Email your request, including your
address, phone number, OMB number,
and CMS document identifier, to
Paperwork@cms.hhs.gov, or call the
Reports Clearance Office on (410) 786–
1326.
In commenting on the proposed
information collections please reference
the document identifier or OMB control
number. To be assured consideration,
comments and recommendations must
be submitted in one of the following
ways by July 9, 2013:
1. Electronically. You may submit
your comments electronically to http://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for ‘‘Comment or
Submission’’ or ‘‘More Search Options’’
to find the information collection
document(s) accepting comments.
2. By regular mail. You may mail
written comments to the following
address: CMS, Office of Strategic
Operations and Regulatory Affairs,
Division of Regulations Development,
Attention: Document Identifier/OMB
Control Number lll, Room C4–26–
05, 7500 Security Boulevard, Baltimore,
Maryland 21244–1850.
Dated: May 6, 2013.
Martique Jones,
Deputy Director, Regulations Development
Group, Office of Strategic Operations and
Regulatory Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2013–11035 Filed 5–9–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120–01–P

(CMS-10062) Collection of Diagnostic Data from Medicare Advantage Organizations for Risk Adjusted Payments


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services
[Document Identifiers: CMS–R–70, CMS–R–
72, CMS–R–247, CMS–10287, CMS–R–43,
CMS–855(POH), CMS–2552–10, and CMS–
10062]
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request
AGENCY: Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services, HHS.
In compliance with the requirement
of section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services (CMS) is publishing the
following summary of proposed
collections for public comment.
Interested persons are invited to send
comments regarding this burden
estimate or any other aspect of this
collection of information, including any
of the following subjects: (1) The
necessity and utility of the proposed
information collection for the proper
performance of the agency’s functions;
(2) the accuracy of the estimated
burden; (3) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and (4) the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology to
minimize the information collection
burden.
1. Type of Information Collection
Request: Reinstatement with a change of
a previously approved collection; Title
of Information Collection: Information
Collection Requirements in HSQ–110,
Acquisition, Protection and Disclosure
of Peer review Organization Information
and Supporting Regulations in 42 CFR,
Sections 480.104, 480.105, 480.116, and
480.134; Use: The Peer Review
Improvement Act of 1982 authorizes
quality improvement organizations
VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:05 May 09, 2013 Jkt 229001 PO 00000 Frm 00037 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\10MYN1.SGM 10MYN1 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register /Vol. 78, No. 91 / Friday, May 10, 2013 /Notices 27401
(QIOs), formally known as peer review
organizations (PROs), to acquire
information necessary to fulfill their
duties and functions and places limits
on disclosure of the information. The
QIOs are required to provide notices to
the affected parties when disclosing
information about them. These
requirements serve to protect the rights
of the affected parties. The information
provided in these notices is used by the
patients, practitioners and providers to:
obtain access to the data maintained and
collected on them by the QIOs; add
additional data or make changes to
existing QIO data; and reflect in the
QIO’s record the reasons for the QIO’s
disagreeing with an individual’s or
provider’s request for amendment.:
Form Number: CMS–R–70 (OCN: 0938–
0426); Frequency: Reporting—On
occasion; Affected Public: Business or
other for-profits; Number of
Respondents: 400; Total Annual
Responses: 21,200; Total Annual Hours:
42,400. (For policy questions regarding
this collection contact Coles Mercier at
410–786–2112. For all other issues call
410–786–1326.)
2. Type of Information Collection
Request: Reinstatement without change
of a previously approved collection;
Title of Information Collection:
Information Collection Requirements in
42 CFR 478.18, 478.34, 478.36, 478.42,
QIO Reconsiderations and Appeals; Use:
In the event that a beneficiary, provider,
physician, or other practitioner does not
agree with the initial determination of a
Quality Improvement Organization
(QIO) or a QIO subcontractor, it is
within that party’s rights to request
reconsideration. The information
collection requirements at 42 CFR
478.18, 478.34, 478.36, and 478.42,
contain procedures for QIOs to use in
reconsideration of initial
determinations. The information
requirements contained in these
regulations are imposed on QIOs to
provide information to parties
requesting the reconsideration. These
parties will use the information as
guidelines for appeal rights in instances
where issues are actively being
disputed. Form Number: CMS–R–72
(OCN: 0938–0443); Frequency:
Reporting—On occasion; Affected
Public: Individuals or Households and
Business or other for-profit institutions;
Number of Respondents: 2,590; Total
Annual Responses: 5,228; Total Annual
Hours: 2,822. (For policy questions
regarding this collection contact Coles
Mercier at 410–786–2112. For all other
issues call 410–786–1326.)
3. Type of Information Collection
Request: Reinstatement with a change of
a previously approved collection; Title
of Information Collection: Expanded
Coverage for Diabetes Outpatient Self-
Management Training Services and
Supporting Regulations Contained in 42
CFR 410.141, 410.142, 410.143, 410.144,
410.145, 410.146, 414.63; Use:
According to the National Health and
Nutrition Examination Survey
(NHANES), as many as 18.7 percent of
Americans over age 65 are at risk for
developing diabetes. The goals in the
management of diabetes are to achieve
normal metabolic control and reduce
the risk of micro- and macro-vascular
complications. Numerous epidemiologic
and interventional studies point to the
necessity of maintaining good glycemic
control to reduce the risk of the
complications of diabetes. Despite this
knowledge, diabetes remains the leading
cause of blindness, lower extremity
amputations and kidney disease
requiring dialysis. Diabetes and its
complications are primary or secondary
factors in an estimated 9 percent of
hospitalizations (Aubert, RE, et al.,
Diabetes-related hospitalizations and
hospital utilization. In: Diabetes in
America. 2nd ed. National Institutes of
Health, National Institute of Diabetes
and Digestive and Kidney Disease, NIH,
Pub. No 95–1468–1995: 553–570).
Overall, beneficiaries with diabetes are
hospitalized 1.5 times more often than
beneficiaries without diabetes. HCFA–
3002–F ‘‘Expanded Coverage for
Outpatient Diabetes Self-Management
Training and Diabetes Outcome
Measurements’’, provided for uniform
coverage of diabetes outpatient selfmanagement
training services. These
services include educational and
training services furnished to a
beneficiary with diabetes by an entity
approved to furnish the services. The
physician or qualified non-physician
practitioner treating the beneficiary’s
diabetes would certify that these
services are needed as part of a
comprehensive plan of care. This rule
established the quality standards that an
entity would be required to meet in
order to participate in furnishing
diabetes outpatient self-management
training services. It set forth payment
amounts that have been established in
consultation with appropriate diabetes
organizations. It implements section
4105 of the Balanced Budget Act of
1997. Form Number: CMS–R–247 (OCN:
0938–0818); Frequency: Recordkeeping
and Reporting—Occasionally; Affected
Public: Business or other for-profit
institutions; Number of Respondents:
5327; Total Annual Responses: 63,924;
Total Annual Hours: 197,542. (For
policy questions regarding this
collection contact Kristin Shifflett at
410–786–4133. For all other issues call
410–786–1326.)
4. Type of Information Collection
Request: Extension of a currently
approved collection; Title of
Information Collection: Medicare
Quality of Care Complaint Form; Use: In
accordance with Section 1154(a)(14) of
the Social Security Act, Quality
Improvement Organizations (QIOs) are
required to conduct appropriate reviews
of all written complaints submitted by
beneficiaries concerning the quality of
care received. The Medicare Quality of
Care Complaint Form will be used by
Medicare beneficiaries to submit quality
of care complaints. This form will
establish a standard form for all
beneficiaries to utilize and ensure
pertinent information is obtained by
QIOs to effectively process these
complaints. Form Number: CMS–10287
(OCN: 0938–1102); Frequency:
Reporting—Occasionally; Affected
Public: Individuals or Households;
Number of Respondents: 3,500; Total
Annual Responses: 3,500; Total Annual
Hours: 583. (For policy questions
regarding this collection contact Coles
Mercier at 410–786–2112. For all other
issues call 410–786–1326.)
5. Type of Information Collection
Request: Reinstatement with change of a
currently approved collection; Title of
Information Collection: Conditions of
Participation for Portable X-ray
Suppliers and Supporting Regulations
in 42 CFR Sections 486.104, 486.106,
486.110; Use: The requirements
contained in this information collection
request are classified as conditions of
participation or conditions for coverage.
These conditions are based on a
provision specified in law relating to
diagnostic X-ray tests ‘‘furnished in a
place of residence used as the patient’s
home,’’ and are designed to ensure that
each supplier has a properly trained
staff to provide the appropriate type and
level of care, as well as, a safe physical
environment for patients. CMS uses
these conditions to certify suppliers of
portable X-ray services wishing to
participate in the Medicare program.
This is standard medical practice and is
necessary in order to help to ensure the
well-being, safety and quality
professional medical treatment
accountability for each patient. Form
Number: CMS–R–43 (OCN: 0938–0338);
Frequency: Yearly; Affected Public:
Business or other for-profit and Not-forprofit
institutions; Number of
Respondents: 578; Total Annual
Responses: 578; Total Annual Hours:
948. (For policy questions regarding this
collections contact Alesia Hovatter at
410–786–6861. For all other issues call
410–786–1326.)
VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:05 May 09, 2013 Jkt 229001 PO 00000 Frm 00038 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\10MYN1.SGM 10MYN1 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
27402 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 91 / Friday, May 10, 2013 / Notices
6. Type of Information Collection
Request: New collection (Request for a
new OMB control number); Title of
Information Collection: Annual Report
of Physician-Owned Hospital
Ownership and/or Investment Interest;
Use: Section 6001 of the Affordable Care
Act (ACA) requires Medicare hospitals
to report whether they have any
physician owners including
immediately family members of the
physician.
Currently the CMS 855A captures
basic ownership/managerial information
on providers. The CMS 855A was
revised in July 2011 and a specific
attachment designed to capture
physician-owned hospital ownership
and investment interest data was added
to the form. The attachment is being
removed from the CMS 855A
application because the annual
reporting requirement for physicianowned
hospitals is not required for
Medicare enrollment processing. This
physician-owned hospital data
collection is mandated to be reported on
an annual basis. Additionally, the ACA
prohibits the expansion of current
physician-owned hospitals and banned
the establishment of new ones making
the CMS 855A the improper method to
collect this required annual report.
CMS is requesting the physicianowned
hospital ownership information,
investment information or both,
previously collected in Attachment 1 of
the CMS 855A enrollment application to
become a stand-alone form with a
unique OMB number for the following
reasons:
• The physician-owned data
collection has a small targeted audience
of approximately 140 physician-owned
hospitals nationwide.
• The physician-owned data
collection is required annually, as noted
above.
• The data required under section
6001 is more specific than the data
currently collected on the CMS–855A
provider enrollment application.
• The data is not required for
Medicare provider enrollment purposes.
Form Number: CMS–855 (POH)(OCN:
0938-New); Frequency: Reporting—
Yearly; Affected Public: Private Sector—
Business or other for-profits and not-forprofit
institutions; Number of
Respondents: 140; Total Annual
Responses: 140; Total Annual Hours:
140. (For policy questions regarding this
collection contact Kim McPhillips at
410–786–5374. For all other issues call
410–786–1326.)
7. Type of Information Collection
Request: Revision of a currently
approved collection; Title of
Information Collection: Hospital and
Health Care Complexes and Supporting
Regulations in 42 CFR 413.20 and
413.24; Use: Medicare Part A
institutional providers must provide
adequate cost data to receive Medicare
reimbursement (42 CFR 413.24(a)).
Providers must submit the cost data to
their Medicare Fiscal Intermediary (FI)/
Medicare Administrative Contractor
(MAC) through the Medicare cost report
(MCR). We are submitting a revision of
the Hospital and Hospital Health Care
Complex Cost Report, Form CMS–2552–
10. Form CMS 2552–10 is used by
hospitals participating in the Medicare
program to report the health care costs
to determine the amount of
reimbursable costs for services rendered
to Medicare beneficiaries. The revisions
were caused by legislative requirements
in the Patient Protection and Affordable
Care Act of 2010 and the Temporary
Payroll Tax Cut Continuation Act of
2011. Form Number: CMS–2552–10
(OCN: 0938–0050); Frequency:
Reporting—Yearly; Affected Public:
Private Sector—Business or other forprofits
and not-for-profit institutions;
Number of Respondents: 6,171; Total
Annual Responses: 6,171; Total Annual
Hours: 4,153,083. (For policy questions
regarding this collection contact Nadia
Massuda at 410–786–5834. For all other
issues call 410–786–1326.)
8. Type of Information Collection
Request: Reinstatement with change of a
previously approved collection. Title of
Information Collection: Collection of
Diagnostic Data from Medicare
Advantage Organizations for Risk
Adjusted Payments. Use: CMS will use
the data to make risk adjusted payment
under Parts C. MA and MA–PD plans
will use the data to develop their Parts
C bids. As required by law, CMS also
annually publishes the risk adjustment
factors for plans and other interested
entities in the Advance Notice of
Methodological Changes for MA
Payment Rates (every February) and the
Announcement of Medicare Advantage
Payment Rates (every April). Lastly,
CMS issues monthly reports to each
individual plan that contains the CMS–
HCC and RxHCC models’ output and the
risk scores and reimbursements for each
beneficiary that is enrolled in their plan.
Form Number: CMS–10062 (OMB 0938–
0838). Frequency: Quarterly. Affected
Public: Private Sector (business or other
for-profit and not-for-profit institutions).
Number of Respondents: 766. Total
Annual Responses: 830,000. Total
Annual Hours: 40,650. (For policy
questions regarding this collection
contact Michael Massimini at 410–786–
1566. For all other issues call 410–786–
1326.)
To obtain copies of the supporting
statement and any related forms for the
proposed paperwork collections
referenced above, access CMS’ Web site
address at http://www.cms.hhs.gov/
PaperworkReductionActof1995, or
Email your request, including your
address, phone number, OMB number,
and CMS document identifier, to
Paperwork@cms.hhs.gov, or call the
Reports Clearance Office on (410) 786–
1326.
In commenting on the proposed
information collections please reference
the document identifier or OMB control
number. To be assured consideration,
comments and recommendations must
be submitted in one of the following
ways by July 9, 2013:
1. Electronically. You may submit
your comments electronically to http://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for ‘‘Comment or
Submission’’ or ‘‘More Search Options’’
to find the information collection
document(s) accepting comments.
2. By regular mail. You may mail
written comments to the following
address: CMS, Office of Strategic
Operations and Regulatory Affairs,
Division of Regulations Development,
Attention: Document Identifier/OMB
Control Number lll, Room C4–26–
05, 7500 Security Boulevard, Baltimore,
Maryland 21244–1850.
Dated: May 6, 2013.
Martique Jones,
Deputy Director, Regulations Development
Group, Office of Strategic Operations and
Regulatory Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2013–11035 Filed 5–9–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120–01–P

Canadian Healthcare Innovation, the MyMedRec App Goes Global





















OTTAWA, ONTARIO -- (Marketwired) -- 05/14/13 --MyMedRec, one of Canada's top free iPhone apps to help people and their families keep track of medication use and immunization history, is now available internationally. MyMedRec
allows users to keep information on their medications and vaccines at their fingertips, ready to share with their healthcare providers.
The personal electronic medication record empowers the growing number of smartphone owners who use mobile devices to manage a wide range of personal data, including their medication information. The World Health Organization has established safe medication use as a priority given that an estimated 50 per cent of patients do not take their medication correctly, while studies have shown that proper adherence to medication improve health outcomes.
Earlier this year, MyMedRec reached the top ten list for free iPhone and iPad apps and has been downloaded by more than 8,000 Canadians. Until now, it was only available in Canada. Consumer requests for the app have come from the U.S, Ireland, Saudi Arabia, and other countries. MyMedRechas received praise from users, health care professionals and app reviewers alike.
"This is a great, innovative app! You are able to keep important medical information with you, ready for use when needed. I especially like the feature where the user is able to photograph and include the label as part of the database for both prescription and natural medications," added Kathleen, who uses the app.
"MyMedRec is a clear, simple and easy to use mobile app. It's a great tool to help people keep a list of not only their prescriptions, but also their vitamins, non-prescription drugs, supplements and immunizations," Kelly Grindrod, Assistant Professor, School of Pharmacy, University of Waterloo and mobile health technology researcher.
MyMedRec was launched in Canada by seven of the country's leading health care organizations to promote adherence and the safe and responsible use of medications and vaccines. Features include a reminder to take a dose or to refill a prescription. MyMedRec is the latest innovation in the "Knowledge is the best medicine" program which was developed in 1994 by Canada's Research-Based Pharmaceutical Companies (Rx&D) as a tool to help Canadians take control of their health and work with their healthcare team to manage medicines safely and appropriately.
"We have been working with our partners to make these tools available because we know that proper adherence to medication leads to healthier outcomes for patients," said Russell Williams, President of Canada's Research-Based Pharmaceutical Companies. "Based on the reaction we have had in Canada and the requests we have received from around the world to make it available globally, we are thrilled to share this tool that we believe everyone can benefit from."
Key Features:
--  Medication and natural products dose reminders 
--  A record of when medicines were taken 
--  A separate archive for medicines the user is no longer taking 
--  Multiple profiles allows the user to keep track of family's health
    information 
--  Easily adds entries to the device's calendar for prescription refills,
    medical appointments and upcoming immunization 
--  Emails parts or all of the user's profile and medication to a healthcare
    provider, as necessary 
--  Additional security with optional separate password and data encryption
    upon locking the device 

The app was developed with the support and collaboration of leading health organizations, including Canada's Research Based Pharmaceutical Companies, Institute for Safe Medication Practices Canada, Canadian Medical Association, Canadian Nurses Association, Canadian Pharmacists Association, Victorian Order of Nurses and Best Medicines Coalition.