Showing posts with label healthcare innovations. Show all posts
Showing posts with label healthcare innovations. Show all posts

Sunday, April 6, 2014

New clinic offers storefront health care

Corvallis’ latest medical practice is not a traditional doctor’s office in a quiet professional center. It’s a storefront clinic in a busy commercial strip, wedged between a coffeehouse and a Mexican restaurant.
CareNow, the latest venture from The Corvallis Clinic, is billed as a “convenience care clinic,” and it’s the first facility of its kind between Salem and Eugene.
The 1,200-square-foot location will open for business Monday in the University Center at 2001 N.W. Monroe Ave., just across the street from the Oregon State University campus.
It will be open seven days a week, including evenings, with 15-minute appointment windows designed to get people in and out quickly. An interactive calendar allows patients to schedule their visits online at the clinic’s website, carenoworegon.com.
The new clinic will be staffed by nurse practitioners and certified medical assistants rather than physicians, which limits the types of care available on-site. CareNow will be able to treat mild illnesses and minor injuries, do checkups and physicals and provide immunizations.
It will also be able to do some quick-turnaround lab tests and fill some patient prescriptions, and patients will check themselves in using touch-screen tablet computers linked into The Corvallis Clinic’s electronic medical records system.
“It’s an opportunity for organizations to provide lower-cost care in a more convenient arrangement,” said Andrew Perry, The Corvallis Clinic’s CEO.
“Our goal is no waiting,” added Norma Soffa, one of two nurse practitioners on staff.
The staffing model also helps to keep costs relatively low. A standard office visit will cost $120, compared to $200 or more for a trip to most Corvallis-area physicians. A sports physical is $50, and a general physical checkup is $180 for an adult or $120 for a child. Prices are posted on the website, and CareNow accepts most insurance plans.
Medical consultation and oversight will be provided by Dr. Robin Lannan, who will act as CareNow’s medical director, as well as Dr. Dennis Regan, the medical director for The Corvallis Clinic.
If a patient comes in with symptoms of a serious health condition such as chest pain, significant shortness of breath or broken bones, they’ll be referred to an urgent care clinic or the hospital emergency room.
CareNow is intended to treat non-emergency cases that come up suddenly and can be handled without stitches, a cast or surgery.
“The best way to think of it,” Soffa said, “is you’re sick and you want to go to the doctor, but your regular doctor can’t see you for a week — that kind of thing.”
While CareNow is the first convenience care clinic in the Corvallis-Albany area, the idea is not new. Similar operations — also known as retail clinics or mini clinics — have popped up rapidly across the country in recent years, with about 1,600 nationwide, many located inside pharmacies or grocery stores.
Among the biggest operations are MinuteClinic, owned by the CVS Caremark pharmacy chain; Healthcare Clinic, affiliated with Walgreens; and the Little Clinic, a subsidiary of Kroger supermarkets.
“It’s all about convenience,” said Ateev Mehrotra, a Harvard professor who has studied the retail clinic phenomenon for Rand Health, a public policy institute of the nonprofit Rand Corp. “People know where the grocery store is.”
And with their more affordable price point, it’s also about filling a niche in the medical marketplace. Mehrotra said his research shows as many as 100 million patient visits a year could be shifted from doctors’ offices and hospital emergency departments to retail clinics with annual cost savings of about $4.5 billion.
“There’s a growing number of people in the United States who have high-deductible health plans,” Mehrotra pointed out. “These clinics offer an alternative to the emergency room.”
Ed Howard, executive director of the nonprofit think tank Alliance for Health Reform, said retail clinics also serve as a kind of relief valve for a health care system already strained by a shortage of primary care doctors. And combined with federally qualified health centers, which have also grown rapidly in recent years, they may also provide some downward pressure on health care costs.
“People have been looking for a more effective, efficient, economical way to deliver care,” Howard said.
Samaritan Health Services, the largest health care provider in the mid-valley, operates several walk-in urgent care sites but has no plans for now to get into the retail clinic business, though it isn’t ruling out the possibility. (The Corvallis Clinic also has one immediate care center in north Corvallis.)
“With health care reform and the increasing demand for health care services, Samaritan is always exploring ways to enhance patient care, whether that be new locations or different delivery models that provide timely and cost-effective care,” said Samaritan spokeswoman Evonne Walls.
But the Corvallis Clinic is betting local residents will respond to CareNow’s combination of convenient location, no-waiting scheduling and low price point. If the experiment is successful, expect to see more CareNow locations popping up around the mid-valley.
“This is our entry into this type of market and setting, and we want to make sure we did it effectively before we decided to expand,” Perry said.
“(But) we also see this as the first of a couple of these kinds of locations we could do in our service area.”

Tuesday, March 25, 2014

LA doctors practice speeding up trauma care

WEST HOLLYWOOD, Calif. (AP) - Before the car-wreck victim reached the emergency room, doctors, residents and nurses at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center knew what to expect by glancing at their smartphones.
The details came in the staccato of text messages: A 35-year-old man had driven head-on into a bus. He suffered major chest injuries. His vital signs were crashing.
This was not just another day in the hospital. It was a laboratory billed as the "OR of the future," an ongoing experiment aimed at breaking down barriers that bog down care through open communication, better use of technology and teamwork.
In reality, trauma care is rarely this organized. But those who are prized for individual skills are increasingly learning that when it comes to treating trauma patients from accidents, natural disasters or terrorist bombings, communication and coordination can determine whether someone lives or dies.
At an office building less than a mile from the main Cedars-Sinai campus, doctors are guinea pigs in simulations designed to test such skills.
There's a "mission control" room filled with video screens where trainers keep track of the action. The walls are see-through. Open workspaces are favored over cubicles.
At the heart of the lab is a room that could be outfitted as the ER, operating room or intensive care unit - depending on the practice of the day. Medical simulation labs have evolved over the years, from simple lifelike models of body parts that doctors train on to full-blown replications of hospital rooms where trainees can practice different situations. The Cedars-Sinai space strives to speed up trauma care by eliminating workflow disruptions and honing communication skills.
"Health care today is delivered more by teams rather than by individuals. We have to educate folks in teamwork skills," said William McGaghie, who heads a professional training institute at Loyola University Chicago Health Sciences Division.
Registered nurse Anna Doyle is used to working with doctors who parachute into the latest crisis, whether it's tending to the victim of a gunshot wound or rollover accident. It's often a chaotic scene, and not everyone takes the time to get to know one another.
During a recent rehearsal, a resident piped up and asked for everyone's names. For a second, it felt like the first day of school as introductions were made.
Doyle said she found the introductions calming - even if it was just practice.
"We had a personal moment ... that never happens," said Doyle, acknowledging that there's always a line of walking wounded in an emergency.
Armed with a $4 million grant from the Defense Department, doctors and nurses at Cedars-Sinai have been testing ways to improve trauma care by running simulations at the newly opened lab that oozes tech startup.
"This is a place for experimentation," surgeon-in-chief Dr. Bruce Gewertz said.
Before the lab opened, Gewertz and his colleagues followed real trauma patients from the moment they were unloaded from the ambulance to their transfer to the ICU. Along the way, the team documented obstacles that slowed down care: Too many people spoke at the same time, prompting a nurse to ask a resident to speak up. A patient went for a CT scan only to find another patient already in the scanner. A resident's cellphone rang while scrubbing in.
Most of the time, researchers found, delays in care were caused by a lack of communication and logistical hurdles.
The goal is to get everyone on the same page during the "golden hour," a concept borrowed from military medicine when time is of the essence.
The team recently partnered with a consulting firm to develop an in-house iPhone app that displays a patient's vitals and blasts out the information to the trauma team as members are assembling. There's also a text-messaging feature that allows doctors and nurses swarming in from various parts of the hospital to communicate with one another before the patient arrives.
It's too early to determine how much it would cost if the app was part of routine care, but Gewertz said it'll be relatively inexpensive, involving the cost of the phones and a monthly license fee for protected data storage.
On a recent weekday, the team's cellphones buzzed with the condition of the first "patient" of the day, the bus-crash victim.
Typically, doctors don't know vitals until a nurse scrawls them on a whiteboard.
Apps can be helpful, allowing medical teams to "know the information en route so they're not coming in cold," said Pam Jeffries, president of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare and a professor at the Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing. Jeffries is not involved in the Cedars-Sinai effort.
The patient - a high-tech dummy - was wheeled in, moaning and complaining. Doctors and nurses sprang into action, ripping off the dummy's clothes and placing a breathing tube before transferring him.
Despite the quick response, there were hiccups, mainly because of a lack of experience. Residents had trouble inserting the tube, and it took several tries to get it right.
For the second scenario, the team was not given advance information about the patient and kept going in circles asking for any details. A doctor said he heard it was a case of a pedestrian hit by a car.
"Do we know if it's male or female?" another asked.
"I don't know much more than auto versus" pedestrian, the doctor said.
The chief resident said there's worry about internal injuries and to make sure blood supply and other essentials were ready.
As if that weren't enough, they also had to deal with a fire - simulated smoke from dry ice was pumped into the room. One called out for the fire alarm to be shut off while the rest prepared to move the patient to a gurney.
In the chaos, doctors didn't realize the wheel on the gurney was locked and wasted time fiddling.
Despite the hiccups, the patients survived in both cases.



Friday, March 7, 2014

HealthStream buys New York Online Training Company for $15.4 Million

Nashville-based HealthStream has acquired Jericho, N.Y.-based Health Care Compliance Strategies, a company focused on interactive and engaging online compliance training for health care organizations, according to a news release.

HealthStream, which provides workforce development solutions for the health care industry, purchased HCCS for approximately $13 million in cash and $2.4 million in shares of HealthStream's common stock in a private placement, the release says. In addition, up to $750,000 in cash will be paid over a 12-month period following closing subject to the achievement of certain performance milestones.
The following are excerpts from today's news release:

Healthcare is one of the most highly regulated industries in the U.S. and the number of regulations continues to grow, which results in growing demands for compliance training. HealthStream has long been the leading provider of workforce development solutions in healthcare, which has included itsOSHA & accreditation compliance training in U.S. hospitals with its 3.7 million subscribers to its platform. With its added capabilities, courseware, and expertise from the acquisition of HCCS, HealthStream now has a comprehensive compliance solution—with a full continuum of services and training programs that addresses the broad range of compliance priorities.
"HealthStream is a perfect fit for HCCS to further support development of the healthcare workforce," said Ben Diamond, president, HCCS. "We are both focused on providing exceptional compliance solutions that, in turn, help to improve patient outcomes and promote compliance with ethical, legal, and accreditation guidelines. HealthStream has pioneered compliance solutions in healthcare and we are excited to play a role in building their robust compliance offering."

Through the acquisition of HCCS, HealthStream adds a comprehensive curriculum of premium compliance courseware and training programs, which include several bundled offerings—like the Quality Improvement Suite, Workplace Compliance Suite, General Compliance Suite, and the Research Compliance Suite. HCCS' courses use fast, rich content, with full motion video and interactivity. Examples of the diverse compliance topics in HCCS' courseware include HIPAA Compliance, Bioterrorism & Disaster Preparation, Patient Rights, Reducing Medication Errors, and Health Plan Compliance. Helping organizations comply with the training requirements of Corporate Integrity Agreements (CIAs) is another specialty area of HCCS that adds to HealthStream's overall compliance solution strategy.

HealthStream's workforce development solutions are also expanded with HCCS' SaaS-based application for tracking potential conflicts of interest disclosures, known as the COI-SMART system. Cumbersome manual processes are automated with COI-SMART as the system tracks and manages potential conflicts of interest among hospitals' physicians, executives, and other healthcare professionals. Correspondingly, courses are also offered in "Conflicts of Interest and Research Misconduct." COI-SMART will be offered on a subscription basis to healthcare organizations, adding another powerful, healthcare-specific application, which will be integrated with HealthStream's workforce development platform.

HealthStream's comprehensive compliance solution will be offered primarily to corporate compliance officers in hospitals, who represent an increasingly important role in healthcare organizations. At this time, 98 percent of healthcare organizations have a corporate compliance officer (CCO) with a staff, on average, of three full-time employees. The Health Care Compliance Association now has over 9,000 active members. Alongside the growing number of federal and state regulatory requirements, the industry-wide focus on improving patient safety has further contributed to the importance of compliance programs in healthcare organizations. The addition of HCCS brings a sales team dedicated to this channel, which will be immediately expanded to cover HealthStream's 10 sales regions.

"I would like to extend a warm welcome to HCCS' clients and employees," said Robert A. Frist, Jr., chief executive officer, HealthStream. "Providing OSHA & accreditation compliance solutions to healthcare organizations has been a core offering for HealthStream for over a decade and we are excited to expand the scope of our solutions in this important area. HCCS' premium content and thought leadership add important dimensions to our compliance solution strategy."


Wednesday, February 12, 2014

Telemedicine Bolsters ICU Care In Rural Maryland Hospitals

FEB 12, 2014
This story was produced in collaboration with 
An intensive care unit nurse in a small-town hospital on Maryland’s scenic Eastern Shore suspected that a patient had necrotizing fasciitis, the so-called “flesh-eating” disease.
The condition is rare. Even experienced intensive care doctors seldom see it, and, since it was nighttime, no such physician was in the ICU. Pinning down the diagnosis was critical—and in this case Berlin, Md.’s Atlantic General Hospital had back-up.
Doctor Marc T. Zubrow, medical director at the University of Maryland Medical System's eCare, says he can use a bank of monitors to care for up to 100 patients in eight different hospitals all over the state of Maryland. Patients can be visually monitored and their lab tests and medical information are contained on the screens (Photo by Barbara Haddock Taylor/Baltimore Sun).
A critical care doctor 125 miles away was monitoring the patient’s health via voice, video and high-speed data lines constantly streaming information about vital signs, medications, test results and X-rays, a telemedicine service known as Maryland eCare. The physician quickly verified that the patient had the deadly infection and arranged immediate transfer to another hospital with a surgeon who could remove the infected tissue.
Atlantic General is one of Maryland eCare’s six original community hospital clients, which have a total of 72 ICU beds. By the end of the year, the program will go live in three more Eastern Shore hospitals, adding 18 more ICU beds.
Studies have shown that patients do better and leave sooner from ICUs managed by intensivists, another term for critical care doctors. But intensivists are in short supply nationwide, and small community hospitals like Atlantic General have a difficult time recruiting and retaining them, let alone paying their salaries. Connecting intensivists to small ICUs via telemedicine, proponents say, is the next best thing to hiring them.
Telemedicine, the exchange of medical information between sites via electronic communications, is being used not only by ICUs but also by other hospital departments, home health agencies and private doctors’ offices. But skeptics suggest that small ICUs might be able to improve care with less expensive measures. Telemedicine now costs hospitals roughly $40,000 to $50,000 a year for each covered bed. Initially, adaptation of telemedicine in ICUs nationwide was rapid, but a new study suggests it is slowing.
One of Maryland eCare’s 20 intensivists monitors ICU patients from 7 p.m. to 7 a.m. weeknights and for 24 hours on Saturdays and Sundays.  They’re stationed at computers in Maryland eCare’s COR—Central Operations Room—which last year moved from the Christiana Care Health System in Wilmington, Del., to the University of Maryland Medical Center in Baltimore. On weekdays, when the hospitals’ critical care doctors are at work, eCare critical care nurses staff the COR computers.
Physicians and nurses at the University of Maryland can monitor ICU patients using voice, video and high-speed data lines that constantly stream information about their vital signs using a telemedicine service known as Maryland eCare (Photo by Barbara Haddock Taylor/Baltimore Sun).
Critical care specialist Atif Zeeshan and another intensivist work in Atlantic General’s ICU from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. on alternating weeks, and they’re on call 24/7. Zeehan said he was at first leery of telemedicine. Four years after his eight-bed ICU hooked up with Maryland eCare, Zeehan is a believer. “There have been cases where lives were saved with eCare intervention,” he says. 
Maryland eCare was established with a $3 million grant from CareFirst BlueCross BlueShield, which helped cover capital expenses, such as computer and video connections. Participating hospitals pay Maryland eCare an annual fee for each ICU bed. Other eCare clients are Peninsula Regional Medical Center in Salisbury, Union Hospital in Elkton, Meritus Medical Center in Hagerstown, Calvert Memorial Hospital in Prince Frederick and MedStar St. Mary’s Hospital in Leonardtown.
Zeeshan’s initial skepticism isn’t unusual. “Nobody wants to be dictated to,” acknowledges Marc Zubrow, a critical care and lung specialist and eCare Maryland’s medical director. “An absolutely huge part of my job,” says Zubrow, is to “convince the local medical community that this will not negatively impact patient care and might possibly improve patient care.”
Hospital representatives routinely visit the Baltimore COR, and Zubrow and members of his team regularly visit the community hospitals and “get very close with the local bedside people.”
And sometimes to patients’ families.  Zubrow shared an eCare doctor’s notes about an interaction with a patient’s daughter (stripped of information that could identify the patient). The woman, who’d flown in to be at her critically ill mother’s bedside, arrived  around 3 a.m. and spent a few minutes video-chatting with the eCare intensivist on duty.
“I told her that nothing we do medically is going to improve her mother’s condition or meaningfully prolong her life,” according to the doctor’s notes. “I urged her to allow us to focus on treating her mother’s pain and suffering…I offered my support and told her I would speak with her again at any point tonight.”
Community hospitals say telemedicine helps critically ill patients be treated close to home and family. Even with extra oversight, however, these hospitals are still not equipped to care for all critically ill patients, so telemedicine intensivists help them decide which patients should be transferred.
Telemedicine has helped improve the care of ICU patients says registered nurse Anne Lockhart, who directs the unit at Calvert Memorial. Lockhart says that includes a reduction in the number of patients contracting pneumonia as a result of being on a ventilator.
Since implementing telemedicine, “we dramatically reduced our ICU mortality rate,” says Ed Grogan, vice president of information services and chief information officer at Calvert Memorial.
But Jeremy Kahn is skeptical. An associate professor of critical care, medicine and health policy at the University of Pittsburgh, he says assessing telemedicine’s effectiveness in the ICU is tricky. Comparing mortality rates before and after implementation of telemedicine doesn’t account for the fact that “outcomes in the ICU get better over time, no matter what,” Kahn says.
A better comparison would be to other, less-expensive, measures, such as using more non-physician providers—physician assistants and nurse practitioners—at ICU patients’ bedsides, Kahn said.
While Maryland eCare is adding hospitals, Kahn says adoption of telemedicine in ICUs nationwide is slowing. In a study published online in October by Critical Care Medicine, Kahn and his colleagues found that the number of U.S. hospitals using telemedicine in ICUs increased from 16, or 0.4 percent, in 2003, to 213, or 4.6 percent, in 2010, with usage doubling in the first four years but dropping to average growth of 8.1 percent in the last four.
 “In an era of cost constraints, I feel we need to be simultaneously exploring cheaper ways to get the same outcome,” Kahn says. “That’s not to say we should not explore telemedicine.”

Thursday, January 30, 2014

NYC gets cash to link 6 million patients with their health records

6 million patients to get their health records linked

Seven New York City health systems have been awarded $7 million in efforts to spur data sharing initiatives and more effective patient recruitment for clinical trials. 

The funding, provided by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, or PCORI, will establish a clinical data research network in New York City, one of 29 such networks nationwide, officials say. These networks together will form PCORnet, the National Patient-Center Clinical Research Network, a $93.5 million patient-centered research initiative. 

The New York City Clinical Data Research Network, or NYC-CDRN, is a consortium composed of 22 regional organizations. The network, officials explain, will share capabilities and develop systems to support data-networking efforts and advance patient-centered research. It will initially focus its efforts on identifying individuals with diabetes, obesity and cystic fibrosis, and will partner with patients and clinicians through disease-specific community workgroups. 

"This contract is an exciting opportunity for leading New York City institutions to work together, through patient-centered research, for the health of the people who live here," said Rainu Kaushal, MD, chair of Weill Cornell's department of healthcare policy and research and the project's principal investigator, in a press release. "It validates New York's infrastructural advances in clinical data sharing."

[See also: Kaiser eyes outcomes with new network.]

The NYC-CDRN builds on six existing National Institutes of Health Clinical and Translational Science Award Centers that already work on collaborative research, data sharing and patient engagement. The CTSA centers are at Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University/Montefiore Medical Center, College of Physicians and Surgeons at Columbia University, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, NYU School of Medicine, Rockefeller University and Weill Cornell. The project also has received support from the New York State Department of Health and builds on infrastructure established by two New York health information exchanges, Healthix and the Bronx Regional Health Information Organization.

The NYC-CDRN network will link medical records for 6 million New York City residents, and all records will be anonymized to protect patient privacy. Over the next 18 months, award recipients will expand and improve their individuals systems and further work to standardize data. Project officials say the scale of the data-sharing between institutions will make it far easier and faster to enroll patients in clinical trials and conduct comparative effectiveness and clinical outcomes research. The goal is to allow patients and providers to have access to evidence-based information they can use to make clinical choices and ultimately to improve healthcare.

PCORI announced back in December it had approved $93.5 million to support the 29 clinical research data networks. 

Earlier this January, it was announced that Kaiser Permanente would be one of these 29 receiving $7 million to build a clinical network focused on obesity, cancer and heart disease.  



Monday, October 7, 2013

As consumer tech speeds up innovation in health, can traditional med tech keep up?


by  

Consumer technology and telecom companies are changing the pace of innovation in health care, putting traditional med tech firms in an uncomfortable position, according to a new report from PricewaterhouseCoopers.
Consumer tech and telecom names like Verizon, AT&T and Sony may be relative newcomers to health care, but that doesn’t mean they’re not going to give industry stalwarts a run for their money.
According to a Monday report from PriceWaterHouseCoopers (PwC) the medical technology field is in the midst of big change. Medtech is transitioning from a growth industry to a more mature, stable one. But it’s also being shaped by a changing health care economy that’s more consumer-centric and emphasizes comprehensive approaches to treating diseases and providing care, the report said.
And increasingly, companies accustomed to spending heavily on years of research are facing new competition from consumer tech startups and mobile app makers that are steeped in a culture of being faster, better and cheaper.
“The new entrants from other industries have a much more aggressive view of what innovation is than traditional medtech companies,” said Chris Wasden, managing director of PwC’s health care strategy and innovation practice. “That will put these traditional medtech companies in a very uncomfortable mode . . . they’re not using to operating at the step-change mode of innovation.”

Learning how to “innovate innovation”

Some of the bigger newcomers mentioned in the report include Verizon, which offers an FDA-cleared remote monitoring system, Qualcomm Life, which provides a wireless platform for connecting a range of devices and apps, and Reebok, which has partnered with startup MC10 for a wearable sensor that monitors the severity of head injuries in contact sports like football.
But plenty of smaller startups, from Scanadu and Biosense Technologies to Glooko to Propeller Health (formerly Asthmapolis), are also finding creative ways to navigate U.S. Food and Drug Administration requirements and appeal to consumers with diagnostic and care-management tools.
PwC’s report was based on dozens of interviews with medtech and digital health leaders from big and small companies. While they overwhelmingly agreed that “the way [they] innovate has to be innovated,” Wasden said,  few have actually chosen to do it because the disruption is so great.
“There are very few companies that view themselves as innovation pioneers,” Wasden said. “Many think of themselves as fast followers.”
Traditional medtech companies have also been slower to adopt new social, mobile, analytic and cloud technologies, the report said. And that means greater opportunities for nimble startups and consumer tech companies familiar with using these kinds of tools to appeal to customers and consumers.

Finding new ways to improve care for the consumer

Not all traditional medtech players are taking a back seat when it comes to innovation, the report acknowledged. Medical device giant Medtronic acquired telehealth company Cardiocom this summer in an effort to get closer to the consumer. And medical device maker Covidien has stepped up its mobile and cloud services to improve the way it supports patient care and hospitals.
Going forward, which companies will be the ones to succeed? Those that can figure out how to appeal to the consumer.
“The people that will win in healthcare . . . are those that understand the customer the best and understand how to change consumer behavior most effectively,” Wasden said. “If you continue to focus on the doctor or hospital, you’re not going to be a winner in the future.”

Tuesday, September 3, 2013

Health Insurance Overhaul - Florida Trends


As the implementation date for the Affordable Care Act nears, employers are scrambling to understand what it means for their business.

Lilly Rockwell | 9/3/2013
The Affordable Care Act is poised to transform our health insurance system, encouraging more people to buy insurance. But as the full implementation date nears, health insurers are raising rates, and employers are scrambling to understand what it means for them.
Before Congress passed a major health insurance reform law, before President Obama was even elected, health insurance company Florida Blue anticipated the emergence of a different health insurance market, with more people buying individual health insurance policies instead of the employer-driven system that most Americans use today.
The Affordable Care Act...
» Requires all Americans to obtain health insurance or pay a tax penalty
» Offers subsidies for low-income Americans
to afford health insurance
» Prohibits insurers from declining coverage
» Largely prohibits charging substantially more based on age or health
» Creates online government-run health insurance exchanges for people and small businesses
» Increases tax credits for small businesses to offset health insurance costs
» Mandates minimum benefits offered, including hospitalization, maternity leave and prescription drugs
» Requires all large employers to offer health insurance or pay a penalty
Jacksonville-based Florida Blue, then called Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida, decided to open a retail store to cater to individual customers. This was a radical idea for a health insurance company at the time — a major shift from a business-to-business sales model working directly with employers to a business-to-consumer sales model. The first store opened in 2006 in Jacksonville at the St. Johns Town Center shopping center.
The move into retail stores turned out to be prescient. Today, the health insurance company operates 11 retail stores in Florida, with plans to open five more by the end of the year. Florida Blue has grown the number of Floridians it covers by individual policies from 277,048 in 2007 to 381,445 in 2011 — a 38% increase, representing more than half of the individual insurance marketplace in Florida.
In fact, Florida Blue holds more individually purchased policies than its top three competitors (Humana, Cigna and United Healthcare) combined. The company credits the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, passed in 2010 with its expansion into the individual market. “It put us in a great position,” says Jason Altmire, Florida Blue’s senior vice president of public policy, government and community affairs.
The affordable care law encourages more people to purchase health insurance regardless of their employment status. But even though the goal of the law is to reduce the number of people without health insurance, many may opt out of getting health insurance, choosing to pay a tax penalty or simply lie about whether they’re covered. The tax penalty the first year is only $95, much cheaper than the average unsubsidized individual insurance policy of $5,500.
How many of the 3.8 million uninsured Floridians will jump into the health insurance market next year, when the individual mandate kicks in? No one knows. “We’re doing everything we can to try to predict what decisions people and employers will make,” Altmire says.
The Congressional Budget Office believes 14 million people nationwide will buy new health insurance policies next year — only a quarter of the total uninsured. The Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured predicts that somewhere between a quarter to half of all uninsured Floridians will obtain health insurance.

Tuesday, July 2, 2013

Why 2013 could turn out to be a watershed year for telehealth

Providing health services remotely can reduce hospitalisations, save lives and help care for people in tough economic times
Remote care
Remote care can play an important role in helping to reduce the mounting pressure on the NHS. Photograph: Graham Turner for the Guardian
Telehealth has the potential to reduce hospitalisations and save lives. It also has an important role to play in caring for people against a challenging economic backdrop.
A report from the King's Fund (Transforming the Delivery of Health and Social Care) recently stated that the health and social care delivery system has failed to keep pace with the needs of an aging population, the changing burdens of disease and rising patient and public expectations.
It has been argued by government, hospital trailblazers and charitable organisations that remote care will play a key role in the hospital of the future. But I would argue that it's time to stop waiting for the future: remote care has an important role to play right now. The mounting pressure on our health system must be addressed imminently.
In fact I believe that a confluence of factors could make 2013 a watershed year in the move to transform and future-proof the NHS.

Joined up care delivery

The Health and Social Care Act 2012 is the most extensive reorganisation of the structure of the NHS in England to date. It is believed that clinical commissioning groups (CCGs) will be better placed than their predecessors (primary care trusts) to plan for patients' needs, in part because commissioning will be led by GPs rather than managers.
Telehealth is particularly well suited to providing quality care in this environment. It equips patients with the tools they need to learn how to self-care, and enables co-ordinated care to be delivered through a team of professionals, including the GP, community nurse, dietician and physiotherapist directly into the home.
The first report from the Whole System Demonstrator project showed how telehealth can improve efficiency and outcomes; as did the community matrons' experience of using telehealth to monitor patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) at central Lancashire trust. For the patients who received the Intel-GE Care Innovations™ Guide, the trust recorded a 21% reduction in hospital readmissions and patients reported a reduction in anxiety levels.

Stimulating home care

But how do we move from sporadic trials to widespread deployment? In part, by recognising that the NHS, like any other employer, has a finite amount of money and needs to balance its books.
The new year of care tariff (YOC) will encourage healthcare providers to deliver whole care requirements for a year. Its introduction essentially encourages a new commissioning process, where the CCGs can contract with one or many organisations to ensure the health risks of a population are managed within a contained budget or tariff.
Adjusting payment based on outcome and prevention, rather than the number of hospital admissions for example, should serve as a cogent incentive for innovation in the form of telehealth.
The right incentives should encourage providers to seek out the best means of treating patients and monitoring conditions before they are allowed to deteriorate.
By taking an integrated approach, all patient needs, including their social and mental care requirements, will be better considered. This should lend itself to the spread of telehealth by encouraging new provider services to co-ordinate care delivery across primary and secondary care, in the community, while helping patients take a more active role in their own health – thereby fulfilling the YOC tariff's pledge to pave the way for a more complete patient experience.
The move to telehealth also has a greater chance of moving from theory to practice with the establishment of the academic health science networks (AHSNs) – a new tier of organisations committed to improving the identification, adoption and spread of innovation in the NHS.
The reasons why telehealth's potential is finally coming to the fore can be attributed to a number of factors. With an aging population beset with long-term illnesses the need to ease the burden on the NHS is being keenly felt. Fortunately the technology is now advanced and ready to deliver manifold benefits, including uninterrupted care in the home. Since the drivers for change have only recently formed, including new organisations in control of the purse strings, only time will tell whether this is the age of telehealth – but the conditions are certainly ripe and ready.
Claire Medd is clinical director at EMEA at Care Innovations, an Intel GE joint venture
This article is published by Guardian Professional.

Thursday, June 27, 2013

Do you want to practice medicine without the hassle and expense of dealing with the insurance companies?


Are you tired of fighting to get paid?

Are your patients concerned about privacy?

Are you tired of paper work?

 Is it just not fun anymore?

MyMD365 is an innovative solution that connects the right providers with the right patients.

The platform will go live on August 1, 2013 and we are now ready to begin signing up providers.

If you are currently practicing in the telehealth space or providing “concierge” care, this site is for you!

If you are considering entering the telehealth space or want to transition into an “alternative” payment model, we are here to help!

Vendors and ancillary service providers, we want you too!

How do I Register?

Please send an email to kgifford@mymd365.com.

Include a description of your business as well as services provided and a good contact number.

www.mymd365.com

Saturday, June 15, 2013

DATA, the Adapting of a New Currency



Todd Gifford, MBA      6/13/2012     tgifford@ermconsultinginc.com

“US warns of cyber-attacks on medical devices”

A man uses a robot to practice surgery in Melle on April 15, 2013. US authorities on Thursday warned makers of medical devices and hospital networks to step up efforts to guard against potential cyber attacks.

A man uses a robot to practice surgery in Melle on April 15, 2013. US authorities on Thursday warned makers of medical devices and hospital networks to step up efforts to guard against potential cyber attacks.


Can you imagine the next episode of Criminal Minds you encounter, experiencing the plot twist of the often overlooked, angry underling rising up to reach out and commit murder by causing the wireless malfunction of the CEO’s perfectly working internal cardiac device” internal defibulator”.It would prove disarming if a medical device could be manipulated to cease performing it’s incredibly important function being turned into an instrument of murder. The malfeasant would soon be caught by the electronic foot print, for this I am sure but the possibility is frightening none the less in light of the world in which we live .

I am comfortable with the math of Big Data, two plus two can equal 3.9 or 4.1.  We accept these parameters not because we rely on big data for the sole factor in our decision making but as reinforcement for our collective theories toward improvement.

I find it unnerving that Target a massive retailer can send correspondence to a man that causes strong anger and resentment due to the giant retailer sending a congratulations on being pregnant to his home targeting “no pun intended” his teenage daughter barely out of Jr. High ,not even 16 years old yet for Heaven’s Sake . The much upset father called the corporate office and complained at length about the mistake.                                    

He felt all the worst when he had to pick up the phone and call the individual he reamed and apologized because it seems his young daughter was indeed pregnant. Kindly explain how Target can know more about a Fathers Household than the Patriarch himself. How do they have the ability to know so much about us? Data mining big data is the easy answer.

To truly understand the scope is beyond my humble mind , but it does make for a genuinely Scary Story.

AFP - US authorities on Thursday warned makers of medical devices and hospital networks to step up efforts to guard against potential cyber attacks.

The US Food and Drug Administration said implanted devices, which could include pacemakers or defibrillators, could be connected to networks that are vulnerable to hackers.

An FDA warning notice was sent to medical device manufacturers, hospitals, medical device user facilities, health care technical staff and biomedical engineers.

It said the agency has recently "become aware of cybersecurity vulnerabilities and incidents that could directly impact medical devices or hospital network operations."

"The FDA is recommending that medical device manufacturers and health care facilities take steps to assure that appropriate safeguards are in place to reduce the risk of failure due to cyberattack," the warning said.

These devices or systems could be compromised "by the introduction of malware into the medical equipment or unauthorized access to configuration settings in medical devices and hospital networks," the FDA said.

"This may sound like it is out of a science fiction movie, but the threat is conceivably a serious one," said Jon Ogg at 24/7 Wall Street.

"Can you imagine a device being retooled maliciously, like an inserted pacemaker/defibrillator? Or imagine if a robotic surgery system was maliciously recalibrated in even a slight manner for surgeries.

"The list of threats is endless."

The FDA said it was "not aware of any patient injuries or deaths associated with these incidents" nor does it have any specific information on targeted devices.

The FDA said it had been working with other federal agencies as well as manufacturers, which it said are "responsible for remaining vigilant about identifying risks and hazards associated with their medical devices."

Among the measures that should be taken, the FDA said, are limiting unauthorized device access, "particularly for those devices that are life-sustaining or could be directly connected to hospital networks."