Josh Valdez took an executive level job in April 2010
expecting to improve medical services at two Puerto Rican Medicare Advantage
health plans owned by a subsidiary of New Jersey company: Aveta Inc.
But a few months after coming on board, the former
government health official claims, he discovered that the plans — MMM
Healthcare and PMC Medicare Choice — had been cheating Medicare out of hundreds
of millions of dollars for years,according
to a whistleblower lawsuit he filed in federal court.
Valdez accuses the health plans of “rampant fraud,” alleging
they overcharged Medicare $300 million to $350 million a year from 2007 through
2010. He claims that Aveta Chief Executive Officer Richard Shinto fired him “in
retaliation for his outspoken opposition to these illegal practices.” Valdez
filed the lawsuit in Santa Ana, California, in April 2011, but it remained
under court seal until February of this year. The case is pending.
In a May 23 statement to the Center for Public Integrity,
the health plans called Valdez a “former disgruntled employee” and added that
the company “categorically denies the allegations in the former employee’s
lawsuit and is highly confident that it will prevail in the case.”
Valdez is a veteran health care executive and consultant who
headed the California regional office of the U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services from 2001 through 2003 under President George W. Bush. He also
was a health policy adviser to Republican Mitt Romney during the 2012
presidential race.
Valdez said in court papers that he served as president of
MSO of Puerto Rico, also owned by a subsidiary of Aveta, for eight months until
his dismissal in December 2010. MSO worked with local doctors to coordinate
coverage for some 230,000 elderly and disabled people then enrolled in those
two Aveta-related Medicare Advantage health plans. In a press release touting
his hire, Aveta said Valdez would enhance medical care while “effectively
managing healthcare costs.”
Aveta’s Puerto Rico health plans and MSO are now operated by
InnovaCare Health Solutions, according to the firm’s website. InnovoCare has
the same Fort Lee, N.J. office and phone number as Aveta. Several members of
the Aveta board, including founding principal investor Daniel E. Straus, have
been affiliated with both companies. Innovacare general counsel Christopher J.
Joyce declined to discuss the corporate structure.
Straus, a prominent investor in several health-care
businesses, also has worked with hedge funds and as a New York City real estate
developer. Joyce said Straus would have no comment.
The whistleblower suit is significant not only for the
magnitude of overbilling it alleges. It also raises questions about federal
oversight of billing practices by health plans that contract with the
government to cover nearly 16 million Americans, at a cost expected to top $150
billion this year.
The federal government paid the two Puerto Rico plans a
total of between $1 billion and $1.8 billion annually from January 2007 through
December 2010, according to the suit. Up to $350 million a year was for bills
that were “improperly inflated,” according to Valdez.
Valdez argues that the health plans sought out chronically
ill patients, who command the highest Medicare payment rates, but overcharged
for them by manipulating a billing formula known as a “risk score.” Medicare
sets risk scores for all patients based on medical data submitted by the health
plans that indicates how sick patients are. Sicker patients mean higher rates.
These scores “were false or fraudulent because they were
based on diagnosis codes that were not substantiated by the medical records or
by the medical conditions of the Medicare beneficiaries served by the plans,”
the suit states.
Valdez said he was told by top executive Shinto in May 2010
that an internal audit of medical records had confirmed that two-thirds of
patient risk scores could not be supported.
According to Valdez, the audit results were discussed at
several executive-level meetings, including some at which top brass talked
about setting up a reserve fund in case federal officials should conduct their
own review and demand refunds.
At a July 2010 meeting, Penelope Kokkinides, Aveta’s chief
operating officer, allegedly said the company would be “screwed” if it was
audited by the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, especially
if the review reached back to 2007. She said overcharges had been “particularly
egregious” that year, as the suit paraphrased her alleged remarks.
Kokkinides estimated the liability to the government was as
high as 20 percent of its total Medicare payment, or about $350 million a year,
Valdez alleges. Kokkinides would not comment on the suit.
During his tenure there, Valdez said, company officials gave
no indication they would “notify CMS of the problem or return the improperly
obtained funds to the government,” according to the suit. CMS regulations not
only require Medicare Advantage plans to attest that risk data they present for
payment are accurate but also obligate them to return any overpayments they
discover.
Still, CMS largely trusts the nation’s 700 Medicare
Advantage plans to report risk scores accurately and honestly — and conducts
only a smattering of yearly audits. There’s no indication that CMS officials
reviewed the risk scores for the two Puerto Rican plans. In its 2012 annual
financial report to insurance officials in Puerto Rico, MMM Healthcare stated
that it had not been subject to a CMS payment audit.
However, in late March of 2011, Valdez said he took his
allegations to the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the central district of
California, which has since launched an investigation. That investigation “has
not been completed,” government lawyers wrote in a January 2014 court filing.
Valdez blamed the faulty risk scores on errors in “medical
status visit” forms filled out by the plans’ doctors. The visits were done to
help identify “high risk” members and maximize payments for them. Doctors
participated in a profit sharing arrangement that paid them 50 percent to 60
percent of surplus money that came in from Medicare as a result of the annual
visits, according to the suit.
The lawsuit alleges that company officials failed to take
“corrective measures to delete or filter out” inaccurate codes, although they
knew the doctors had an incentive to inflate them.
In July 2010, executives decided to hold onto millions of
dollars in these payments to the doctors in case CMS auditors required the
company to repay money, according to the suit.
That concern didn’t dissuade company officials from
borrowing $100 million, which was used to pay a dividend to investors, “the
largest of whom was founder and Chairman Daniel E. Straus,” according to the
suit. Valdez said he objected to paying the dividend while the potential
liability to the government “remained unaddressed.”
